Report not self-consistent for P(i)
Due to the Monte Carlo methods introduced, we now get conflicting results for the same case: If I run a mask-less simulation for a room of 1000m3 in Jan, 2 persons, 1 infected, 1 window of 1 meter high/open to 1m with the rest of the settings as default, I can get:
3% for the main result 4% for the 'alternative scenario' of no masks and ventilation (same case as the main result.. different P(i))
And if I run the same calc again, I can get the reverse. Unless there's an explainer I missed that has already been added, this is going to confuse people (it confused me initially!).