Corryvreckan issueshttps://gitlab.cern.ch/corryvreckan/corryvreckan/-/issues2019-10-29T13:40:51+01:00https://gitlab.cern.ch/corryvreckan/corryvreckan/-/issues/76Allow Data Duplication2019-10-29T13:40:51+01:00Simon SpannagelAllow Data DuplicationWe should allow for data which are not from the event-defining detector to be duplicated.
Imagine the (very real) situation in which we have a very short frame with a high rate produced by the DUT to define out event. Now we would like ...We should allow for data which are not from the event-defining detector to be duplicated.
Imagine the (very real) situation in which we have a very short frame with a high rate produced by the DUT to define out event. Now we would like to add M26 data to it with its very long frame length. This works fine for the first event, but the subsequent DUT frames will not have any data assigned to them because the M26 reader already went to the next frame and evaluates this as position `AFTER`.
If we retain the event even if classified as `DURING` and re-evaluate the next time, in the case above it would again return `DURING` and we would re-assign it.
In the more "normal" case where we really moved on, we will simply evaluate it as `BEFORE` and move on to the next event.
Is there a flaw in this logic or does this make sense?https://gitlab.cern.ch/corryvreckan/corryvreckan/-/issues/61Multiple track reconstructions modules with different pixel ranges2019-09-19T10:30:22+02:00Lennart HuthMultiple track reconstructions modules with different pixel rangesI am wondering how to implement an analysis flow like presented here (slide 15):
https://indico.cern.ch/event/731649/contributions/3237289/attachments/1778200/2891938/BTTB_Corryvreckan_tutorial_final.pdf
My idea is to read in data, perf...I am wondering how to implement an analysis flow like presented here (slide 15):
https://indico.cern.ch/event/731649/contributions/3237289/attachments/1778200/2891938/BTTB_Corryvreckan_tutorial_final.pdf
My idea is to read in data, perform clustering and then use each layer as DUT, asking for a track fit without the dut.
Is this possible? It would significantly reduce the computation time in our case, as most time is spent reading in the data.