Follow up on !269 : Possible Improvements in Tracking4D
This ticket is a reminder on the open discussion in
Just a question that came up in the silicon discussion today: Currently, the first and last planes of the telescope are taken as the initial reference planes if I understand correctly. Is this always a suitable approach? What if the last plane has a (significantly) worse spatial resolution than the second to last?
Let's maybe approach this in a two-step model: we agree that this MR is a major improvement over what is currently available and merge it. And after that we think about all possible corner cases for odd set-ups and maybe introduce new features. What do you think?