Follow-up from "GBL with correct treatment of rotations"
The following discussion from !254 (merged) should be addressed:
-
@simonspa started a discussion: (+1 comment) I would prefer if we could keep the plane construct completely contained within the track. Now it is pretty dirty since we need to construct a plane (allocate) then copy it into the track etc. This exposes quite some "inner workings" which is not nice.