Follow-up from "Fixes for new stack definitions"
The following discussion from !335 (merged) should be addressed:
-
@bcouturi started a discussion: (+1 comment) It's ok for the moment but we should parametrize this/have our own copy at some point
The following discussion from !335 (merged) should be addressed:
It's ok for the moment but we should parametrize this/have our own copy at some point