Follow-up from "Spruce reports to RawBanks, further cleanup of HltDAQ"
The following discussion from !3260 (merged) should be addressed:
-
@graven started a discussion: (+3 comments) I'm trying to adapt the failing test -- which actually revealed that in 2015 we were writing some duplicated entries in the
HltSelReports
(which is properly dealt with -- once I figured out the problem the solution was easy! -- but this just cost time to convince myself what was going on), and that the 'split' version of the test was never really used, so it wasn't configured consistently. So basically adapting all the tests is actually taking much more time than adding the actual functionality. So I would like to know how badly we really need to have the failing tests to work again... or that the can just be disabled and put on an issue in order to be looked again at some time in the future...