Follow-up from "Propagate changes from CaloFutureShowerOverlapTool"
The following discussion from !1592 (merged) should be addressed:
-
@cmarinbe started a discussion: It was suggested to change the signature to
const LHCb::CaloCluster& c1, const LHCb::CaloCluster& c2, ...
so that it becomes the responsibility of the caller to pass a valid object. To be done.
Edited by Carla Marin Benito