RUN5 : Follow-up from "Draft: Tracking using PrAlgorithms on run 5 simulation" , MT reconstructible criteria

The following discussion from !4664 (merged) should be addressed:

  • @rquaglia started a discussion: (+2 comments)

    Hi @clangenb , this looks great. I wonder as those masks are kept separate atm, would those definition need to be re-updated to include also those tracks migrating pixel to fibres?

Different viable approaches in the thread discussed. Agreement to find to be able to keep separate

  • MP hits reconstrucitble tracks (pixels in T1,2,3)
  • FT hits reconstructible ( same as run3 very likely (T1,T2,T3 has at least one x and uv layer )
  • Mixed hits reconstructible
  • But at the same time have a unique hastT flag to use

In checkers we then can do

  • hasT
  • hasT && hasMPOnlyRecoble
  • hasT && hasFTOnlyRecoble
  • hasT && hasMPFTRecoble
To upload designs, you'll need to enable LFS and have an admin enable hashed storage. More information