RUN5 : Follow-up from "Draft: Tracking using PrAlgorithms on run 5 simulation" , MT reconstructible criteria
The following discussion from !4664 (merged) should be addressed:
-
@rquaglia started a discussion: (+2 comments) Hi @clangenb , this looks great. I wonder as those masks are kept separate atm, would those definition need to be re-updated to include also those tracks migrating pixel to fibres?
Different viable approaches in the thread discussed. Agreement to find to be able to keep separate
- MP hits reconstrucitble tracks (pixels in T1,2,3)
- FT hits reconstructible ( same as run3 very likely (T1,T2,T3 has at least one x and uv layer )
- Mixed hits reconstructible
- But at the same time have a unique
hastTflag to use
In checkers we then can do
hasThasT && hasMPOnlyRecoblehasT && hasFTOnlyRecoblehasT && hasMPFTRecoble