Follow-up from "Updating SL lines with ThOr functors and adding new lines"
The following discussions from !1151 (merged) should be addressed:
-
@mvesteri started a discussion: This is presumably a minimum delta Z between the B and D? Maybe add a
minto the arguments/variables. -
@mvesteri started a discussion: Maybe all decay descriptors follow
B -> {hadron} muorB-> mu {hadron}so you can simply cut on the DeltaZ between the parent vertex and child 1/2 vertex? It feels a bit error prone, and hard to understand/maintain, to search through a list of charm IDs. (The code looks familiar to me from the stripping but I reserve the right to dislike my old code implementations😄 ) -
@mvesteri started a discussion: pt_min? -
@mvesteri started a discussion: Can this comment be removed?
-
@mvesteri started a discussion: Should this have
resolvedin the name?What would work best in the future if you decided to include merged pi0 somewhere?
-
@mvesteri started a discussion: I don't have a better suggestion right now, but it feels hard to understand (at the point of use in some combination) that these have the pion hypothesis.
-
@mvesteri started a discussion: Is it a min or max cut?
😉 -
@mvesteri started a discussion: Totally up to you but
chargethree, or similar, would be more descriptive thannonphys. (not sure if there is any other use ofnonphysthough)