Skip to content

Revisit wrapping of FastJet and retire IJetMaker interface

The following discussion from !617 (merged) should be addressed:

  • @graven started a discussion: (+5 comments)

    It looks like this algorithm is a small wrapper around a tool -- in that case, maybe it is better to just move the code from the tool 'into' the algorithm instead of having a separate tool.

Edited by Gerhard Raven