WP counting pixels with occupancy in digital scan different than 100
I was wondering why you use median value of digital occupancy when you are counting the number of pixels with the digital occupancy different than 100? I was naively expecting that this should be 100: https://gitlab.cern.ch/silab/bdaq53/-/blob/development/bdaq53/waferprobing/analysis/ITkPix/analyze_wafer_ITkPixV2.py#L1345 Is it possible that in the chip that has median of digital occupancy different than 100, the number of bad pixels is not correctly counted? Tagging @theim
Thanks Marija