Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects

Adding l1topo simulation in phase 1 sequence

Merged Nicola Orlando requested to merge (removed):l1topo_simulation_integration_1 into 21.3

This MR completes what started here !22414 (merged) . It needs a recent fix to KalmanMETCorrection as implemented here !22766 (merged) and a small function as implemented here !22762 (merged) .

Currently not enabling the L1Topo simulation as default in the simulation sequence. Waiting for MR above to be pushed in 21.3. Among the changes this fixes the jira ticket https://its.cern.ch/jira/browse/ATR-19645 which affected MET and jets energy units conversion (MeV->GeV).

Edited by Nicola Orlando

Merge request reports

Merged by avatar (Apr 25, 2025 8:40am UTC)

Loading

Activity

Filter activity
  • Approvals
  • Assignees & reviewers
  • Comments (from bots)
  • Comments (from users)
  • Commits & branches
  • Edits
  • Labels
  • Lock status
  • Mentions
  • Merge request status
  • Tracking
  • Tobias Bisanz
  • Very small minor comments, aside from those I'm happy to approve this ASAP! L1.

  • Hi @tbisanz , the reason for the division by 1000 is mentioned in the description of the MR which also points to a Jira ticket. The reason for it is the the new L1Calo inputs to the L1Topo simulation, notably MET and jets have energy save in MeV instead of GeV; this breaks the L1Topo simulation because the energy values are expected to fall within a certain range.

  • As for your comment on the twiki I prefer to have it for bookkeeping. We are in a development phase.. Thanks, Nicola

  • Hi, removing the review-user-action-required label to make sure this is not overlooked due to the turnover of L1 shifter. Thanks Nicola

    Edited by Nicola Orlando
  • Looks fine to me as well, but please resolve the open discussions.

    Eric (L1)

  • Nicola Orlando resolved all discussions

    resolved all discussions

  • done, thanks

    Edited by Nicola Orlando
  • Sorry - I think my comment happened at the same time as all the discussions were resolved.

  • added review-approved label and removed review-pending-level-1 label

  • Hi @jchapman sorry I had missed your comment, fixing this now

  • Nicola Orlando added 1 commit

    added 1 commit

    • 36488735 - Update EnergyInputProviderFEX.cxx MeV to GeV

    Compare with previous version

  • Nicola Orlando added 1 commit

    added 1 commit

    • 024966f2 - Update JetInputProviderFEX.cxx MeV to GeV

    Compare with previous version

  • This merge request affects 2 packages:

    • Trigger/TrigT1/L1Topo/L1TopoSimulation
    • Trigger/TrigT1/TrigT1CaloFexSim

    Adding @jchapman ,@vpascuzz as watchers

  • added review-pending-level-1 label and removed review-approved label

  • This merge request affects 2 packages:

    • Trigger/TrigT1/L1Topo/L1TopoSimulation
    • Trigger/TrigT1/TrigT1CaloFexSim

    Adding @jchapman ,@vpascuzz as watchers

  • :white_check_mark: CI Result SUCCESS

    Athena
    externals :white_check_mark:
    cmake :white_check_mark:
    make :white_check_mark:
    required tests :white_check_mark:
    optional tests :white_check_mark:

    Full details available at NICOS MR-22810-2019-04-25-23-17
    :warning: Athena: number of compilation errors 0, warnings 3
    :pencil: For experts only: Jenkins output [CI-MERGE-REQUEST 37656]

  • :white_check_mark: CI Result SUCCESS

    Athena
    externals :white_check_mark:
    cmake :white_check_mark:
    make :white_check_mark:
    required tests :white_check_mark:
    optional tests :white_check_mark:

    Full details available at NICOS MR-22810-2019-04-25-23-32
    :warning: Athena: number of compilation errors 0, warnings 1
    :pencil: For experts only: Jenkins output [CI-MERGE-REQUEST 37655]

  • Tadej Novak resolved all discussions

    resolved all discussions

  • This looks like it can be approved now.

    Tadej (L2)

  • added review-approved label and removed review-pending-level-1 label

  • mentioned in commit 0e7ed9b0

  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Please register or sign in to reply
    Loading