change 2j to 3j for photon chains and update the seed for a tau_xe chain (ATR-19317)

• g35_loose_L1EM30VHI_2j25 -> g35_loose_L1EM30VHI_3j25
• g35_loose_L1EM30VHI_2j15_gsc25_boffperf_split -> g35_loose_L1EM30VHI_3j15_gsc25_boffperf_split
• g35_loose_L1EM30VHI_2j15_gsc25_boffperf_split_FTK -> g35_loose_L1EM30VHI_3j15_gsc25_boffperf_split_FTK
• change L1 seed of tau50_mediumRNN_tracktwoMVA_xe80_pufit_xe50_L1XE50 to L1_TAU20IM_2J20_XE50
• add e24_lhmedium_nod0_mu8noL1 with L1_EM20VH
• add j70_j50_0eta490_invm1000j70_dphi20_deta45_L1MJJ-500-NFF

added 1 commit

• 4017dcc7 - add an e-mu chain and a NFF chain

Compare with previous version

unmarked as a Work In Progress

changed the description

This merge request affects 1 package:

• Trigger/TriggerCommon/TriggerMenu

added 21.3 Trigger TriggerMenu review-pending-level-1 labels

CI Result SUCCESS

	Athena
externals
cmake
make
required tests
optional tests

Full details available at NICOS MR-25153-2019-07-26-18-38
Athena: number of compilation errors 0, warnings 0
For experts only: Jenkins output [CI-MERGE-REQUEST 40105]

added review-user-action-required label and removed review-pending-level-1 label

Hi @tadej ,

If you mean the commented line about "tau50_mediumRNN_tracktwoMVA_xe80_pufit_xe50_L1XE50", it is not needed. I did a test, and forgot to clean it. Sorry for inconvenience.

Cheers, Ligang

resolved all discussions

added 1 commit

• c4cff638 - remove one commented line in MC_pp_v8

Compare with previous version

This merge request affects 1 package:

• Trigger/TriggerCommon/TriggerMenu

added review-pending-level-1 label and removed review-user-action-required label

added review-pending-expert label

CI Result SUCCESS

	Athena
externals
cmake
make
required tests
optional tests

Full details available at NICOS MR-25153-2019-08-12-18-10
Athena: number of compilation errors 0, warnings 163
For experts only: Jenkins output [CI-MERGE-REQUEST 40321]

Hi @lixia, a question from an L1. Can you elaborate on why you labeled this MR as review-pending-expert?

removed review-pending-expert label

Hi @etakeva , Sorry, I removed the label. I thought the label was to remind the reviewers for checking, but it should be L1 revierwers to decide to add this label or not.

@lixia Okay, I will go ahead and approve now.

added review-approved label and removed review-pending-level-1 label

merged

mentioned in commit ca00945c

added sweep:ignore label

mentioned in merge request !26017 (merged)

mentioned in commit e5917b77