For the unimplemented Accessors cppcheck complains for reaching the exit path from function with non-void return type
For the unimplemented Accessors cppcheck complains for reaching the exit path from function with non-void return type that has missing return statement. In reality we do not need these definitions, in principle we need the declaration (template) and then the definitions of the explicit specializations that are in use
ping @sroe
Merge request reports
Activity
added EDM JetEtmiss Tau analysis-review-required master review-pending-level-1 labels
CI Result SUCCESS (hash 92f23490)Athena AthSimulation AthGeneration AnalysisBase AthAnalysis DetCommon externals cmake make required tests optional tests Full details available on this CI monitor view
Athena: number of compilation errors 0, warnings 0
AthSimulation: number of compilation errors 0, warnings 0
AthGeneration: number of compilation errors 0, warnings 0
AnalysisBase: number of compilation errors 0, warnings 0
AthAnalysis: number of compilation errors 0, warnings 0
DetCommon: number of compilation errors 0, warnings 0
For experts only: Jenkins output [CI-MERGE-REQUEST-CC7 40106]added review-approved label and removed review-pending-level-1 label
added analysis-review-approved label and removed analysis-review-required label
mentioned in commit 99796e8b
added sweep:ignore label
mentioned in merge request !47397 (merged)