Broadening default muon selection for muon CP tools
Based on a thread on the AMG list, broadening the muon selection to 2.7. This should be safe, as tighter working points will come with a tighter default selection (e.g. tight requires eta<2.5), but will allow people to use standalone, loose, and medium muons beyond 2.5 if they exist. Will result in a very small increase in PHYSLITE size.
Merge request reports
Activity
added Derivation changes-derivation-output labels
This merge request affects 1 package:
- PhysicsAnalysis/Algorithms/MuonAnalysisAlgorithms
This merge request affects 2 files:
- PhysicsAnalysis/Algorithms/MuonAnalysisAlgorithms/python/MuonAnalysisConfig.py
- PhysicsAnalysis/Algorithms/MuonAnalysisAlgorithms/python/MuonAnalysisSequence.py
added Analysis analysis-review-required master review-pending-level-1 labels
CI Result SUCCESS (hash a02ba4c6)Athena AnalysisBase AthAnalysis externals cmake make tests Full details available on this CI monitor view. Check the JIRA CI status board for known problems
Athena: number of compilation errors 0, warnings 0
AnalysisBase: number of compilation errors 0, warnings 0
AthAnalysis: number of compilation errors 0, warnings 0
For experts only: Jenkins output [CI-MERGE-REQUEST-CC7 67733]- Resolved by Marco Vanadia
yes, even the Medium WP allows for usage of standalone muons in the eta 2.5-2.7 region, see https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/AtlasProtected/MCPAnalysisGuidelinesR22#Identification_WPs
so they should be included. Please note that for run3 SA muons are not yet supported and will be rejected by the WPs (i.e. by the MuonSelectionTool).
Cheers, Marco
added review-approved label and removed review-pending-level-1 label
added analysis-review-approved label and removed analysis-review-required label
mentioned in commit 29d2445a
added sweep:ignore label