MET Reco: workaround to avoid unmerged CA

Work towards making !61689 (merged) pass. This time fixing MET reconstruction. Similar to !61828 (merged)

FYI @tadej @tbold @fwinkl @schaarsc @mswiatlo

added JetEtmiss NewConfig Reconstruction bugfix labels

This merge request affects 1 package:

• Reconstruction/MET/METReconstruction

This merge request affects 1 file:

• Reconstruction/MET/METReconstruction/python/METRecoCfg.py

Adding @goetz as watcher

added 23.0 review-pending-level-1 labels

But where is self.accumulator consumed then? It will still stay unmerged (or am I missing something)?

added 1 commit

• 7c65fcf0 - MET Reco: workaround to avoid unmerged CA

Compare with previous version

This merge request affects 1 package:

• Reconstruction/MET/METReconstruction

This merge request affects 4 files:

• Reconstruction/MET/METReconstruction/python/METCalo_Cfg.py
• Reconstruction/MET/METReconstruction/python/METRecoCfg.py
• Reconstruction/MET/METReconstruction/python/METTrack_Cfg.py
• Reconstruction/MET/METReconstruction/python/METTruth_Cfg.py

Adding @goetz as watcher

resolved all threads

mentioned in merge request !61689 (merged)

CI Result SUCCESS (hash 6ac1fb33)

	Athena
externals
cmake
make
tests

Full details available on this CI monitor view. Check the JIRA CI status board for known problems
Athena: number of compilation errors 0, warnings 0
For experts only: Jenkins output [CI-MERGE-REQUEST-CC7 68845]

CI Result SUCCESS (hash 7c65fcf0)

	Athena
externals
cmake
make
tests

Full details available on this CI monitor view. Check the JIRA CI status board for known problems
Athena: number of compilation errors 0, warnings 0
For experts only: Jenkins output [CI-MERGE-REQUEST-CC7 68852]

Looks good. L1

added review-approved label and removed review-pending-level-1 label

added review-approved-tier0 label

added review-approved-point1 label

mentioned in commit 50cccae4

merged

mentioned in merge request !61935 (merged)