potential bug

having something like

def PhysValMonitoringCfg(flags, name="PhysValMonManager", tools=[], **kwargs):

is quite dangerous.

Fixing this by setting tools=None and then check

added bugfix label

/cc @ncalace and @tstreble

Should this go directly to main or can we go to 23.0?

This merge request affects 1 package:

• PhysicsAnalysis/PhysicsValidation/PhysValMonitoring

This merge request affects 1 file:

• PhysicsAnalysis/PhysicsValidation/PhysValMonitoring/python/PhysValMonitoringConfig.py

added Analysis main review-pending-level-1 labels

I think some PhysVal campaigns might be running in 23.0. It won't hurt to have it there in any case.

changed target branch from main to 23.0

closed

CI Result SUCCESS (hash ab66320e)

	Athena
externals
cmake
make
tests

Full details available on this CI monitor view. Check the JIRA CI status board for known problems
Athena: number of compilation errors 0, warnings 0
For experts only: Jenkins output [CI-MERGE-REQUEST-CC7 74504]