FTAG: fix vertex labelling bug
This fixes a bug in the ftag truth vertex labelling spotted by @npond.
Reference: (before !62888 (merged) and !62544 (merged))
values: [-2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15]
counts: [ 473 13495 1676 84 105 117 107 113 99 77 52 33
28 13 4 2 1 1]
Current:
values: [-2 -1 0 1 8]
counts: [ 473 13495 2509 2 1]
This MR:
values: [-2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 38 43]
counts: [ 473 13495 1676 38 29 35 30 26 30 25 37 35
27 33 38 41 38 38 29 19 46 37 30 29
30 12 19 13 5 6 20 8 2 4 1 4
8 1 3 8 2]
Note that the new labelling is per-event rather than per-jet so the vertex indices are higher in the current scheme. What is important is that the number of vertex indices == 0 (PV) is now equal (1676) and the number vertex indices >0 is also equal.
Merge request reports
Activity
This merge request affects 1 package:
- PhysicsAnalysis/JetTagging/FlavorTagDiscriminants
This merge request affects 3 files:
- PhysicsAnalysis/JetTagging/FlavorTagDiscriminants/FlavorTagDiscriminants/TruthParticleDecoratorAlg.h
- PhysicsAnalysis/JetTagging/FlavorTagDiscriminants/src/TruthDecoratorHelpers.cxx
- PhysicsAnalysis/JetTagging/FlavorTagDiscriminants/src/TruthParticleDecoratorAlg.cxx
@dguest @bdong we should probably add our truth labels to the frozen derivation tests. Is that done by updating this file: https://acode-browser.usatlas.bnl.gov/lxr/source/athena/Tools/PROCTools/data/mc_PHYS_Run2_DAOD_PHYS_diff-interest-list.txt?
- Resolved by Samuel Van Stroud
Do we add these to phys? Not sure it would work otherwise.
CI Result SUCCESS (hash a7a942b3)Athena AnalysisBase AthAnalysis externals cmake make tests Full details available on this CI monitor view. Check the JIRA CI status board for known problems
Athena: number of compilation errors 0, warnings 0
AnalysisBase: number of compilation errors 0, warnings 0
AthAnalysis: number of compilation errors 0, warnings 0
For experts only: Jenkins output [CI-MERGE-REQUEST-CC7 79511]removed review-pending-level-1 label
added review-approved label
Hi @svanstro,
I'm not sure if this affects analysis directly, if so, please add the Recommendation and/or bugfix labels. Otherwise approving from the analysis release side.
Cheers, Nils [Analysis RC]
added analysis-review-approved label and removed analysis-review-required label
mentioned in commit a4aeac98
added sweep:ignore label
mentioned in merge request atlas-flavor-tagging-tools/training-dataset-dumper!561 (merged)