Rename GN2X working points based on the study by @rjoshihere.
The old working points were defined by averaging the efficiencies of a serials of RS graviton HH4b samples with different masses. This definition complicates the validation workflow. We now switch to a new definition using the efficiencies of a single sample, the flat mass VHbb sample.
The mapping is as below:
Old WP -> new WP
60% -> 79%
70% -> 86%
80% -> 91%
90% -> 96%
There is no change in the cut values, so no change in trigger counts. Only the trigger names are changed.
