avoid hardwiring hashes in algorithm names
Merge request reports
Activity
added bug fix label
added RTA label
- Resolved by Rosen Matev
removed bug fix label
added cleanup label
- Resolved by Rosen Matev
/ci-test
added ci-test-triggered label
- [2023-06-12 12:41] Validation started with lhcb-master-mr#8219
added needs ref update label
mentioned in commit e8659bdf
The RefBot pipeline created the following reference update MRs: !391 (merged)
Click this to see encountered Alignment warnings
Alignment: Warning, results for test: Humboldt.align-ft-modules not found for platforms: {'x86_64_v3-centos7-gcc11-opt+g', 'x86_64_v3-centos7-gcc11+detdesc-opt+g'} Alignment: Different test results for Alignment/Humboldt/tests/refs/align-ft-modules.ref on platforms ['x86_64_v2-centos7-gcc11-opt', 'x86_64_v2-centos7-gcc11-dbg', 'x86_64_v2-centos7-clang12-opt', 'x86_64_v2-el9-gcc12-opt'] Alignment: Comparing x86_64_v2-centos7-gcc11-opt to: Alignment: x86_64_v2-centos7-gcc11-dbg differs by: Alignment: Differences in CountersMismatch: Alignment: x86_64_v2-centos7-gcc11-opt: (CaloTrackBasedElectronShowerAlg_... new) average DLL | 1003 | -52.02665 | -0.051871 | 0.086185 | -0.53790 | 0.24086 (CaloTrackBasedElectronShowerAlg_...2 new) average DLL | 998 | -52.24504 | -0.052350 | 0.086984 | -0.53846 | 0.23604 Alignment: x86_64_v2-centos7-gcc11-dbg: (CaloTrackBasedElectronShowerAlg_... new) average DLL | 1003 | -52.02664 | -0.051871 | 0.086185 | -0.53790 | 0.24086 (CaloTrackBasedElectronShowerAlg_...2 new) average DLL | 998 | -52.24503 | -0.052350 | 0.086984 | -0.53846 | 0.23604 Alignment: x86_64_v2-centos7-clang12-opt differs by: Alignment: Differences in CountersMismatch: Alignment: x86_64_v2-centos7-gcc11-opt: (CaloTrackBasedElectronShowerAlg_... new) average DLL | 1003 | -52.02665 | -0.051871 | 0.086185 | -0.53790 | 0.24086 (CaloTrackBasedElectronShowerAlg_...2 new) average DLL | 998 | -52.24504 | -0.052350 | 0.086984 | -0.53846 | 0.23604 Alignment: x86_64_v2-centos7-clang12-opt: (CaloTrackBasedElectronShowerAlg_... new) average DLL | 1003 | -52.02664 | -0.051871 | 0.086185 | -0.53790 | 0.24086 (CaloTrackBasedElectronShowerAlg_...2 new) average DLL | 998 | -52.24503 | -0.052350 | 0.086984 | -0.53846 | 0.23604 Alignment: x86_64_v2-el9-gcc12-opt differs by: Alignment: Differences in CountersMismatch: Alignment: x86_64_v2-centos7-gcc11-opt: (CaloTrackBasedElectronShowerAlg_... new) average DLL | 1003 | -52.02665 | -0.051871 | 0.086185 | -0.53790 | 0.24086 (CaloTrackBasedElectronShowerAlg_...2 new) average DLL | 998 | -52.24504 | -0.052350 | 0.086984 | -0.53846 | 0.23604 Alignment: x86_64_v2-el9-gcc12-opt: (CaloTrackBasedElectronShowerAlg_... new) average DLL | 1003 | -52.02664 | -0.051871 | 0.086185 | -0.53790 | 0.24086 (CaloTrackBasedElectronShowerAlg_...2 new) average DLL | 998 | -52.24503 | -0.052350 | 0.086984 | -0.53846 | 0.23604 Alignment: Warning, results for test: Humboldt.align-ft-halfmodules not found for platforms: {'x86_64_v3-centos7-gcc11-opt+g', 'x86_64_v3-centos7-gcc11+detdesc-opt+g'} Alignment: Warning, results for test: Humboldt.align-vp-halves-modules-prkalman not found for platforms: {'x86_64_v3-centos7-gcc11-opt+g', 'x86_64_v3-centos7-gcc11+detdesc-opt+g'} Alignment: Warning, results for test: Humboldt.align-run3-collisions not found for platforms: {'x86_64_v3-centos7-gcc11-opt+g', 'x86_64_v3-centos7-gcc11+detdesc-opt+g'} Alignment: Warning, results for test: Humboldt.align-vp-halves-modules-tmf not found for platforms: {'x86_64_v3-centos7-gcc11-opt+g', 'x86_64_v3-centos7-gcc11+detdesc-opt+g'} Alignment: Different test results for Alignment/Humboldt/tests/refs/align-vp-halves-modules-tmf.ref on platforms ['x86_64_v2-centos7-gcc11-opt', 'x86_64_v2-centos7-gcc11-dbg', 'x86_64_v2-centos7-clang12-opt', 'x86_64_v2-el9-gcc12-opt'] Alignment: Comparing x86_64_v2-centos7-gcc11-opt to: Alignment: x86_64_v2-centos7-gcc11-dbg differs by: Alignment: Differences in Output Diff: Alignment: x86_64_v2-centos7-gcc11-opt: Average number of tracks per vertex: 7.38278 Normalised alignment change chisquare: 0.00472847 Number of active parameters: 168 Number of alignables with insufficient statistics: 0 Number of negative eigenvalues: 24 ToolSvc.EigenDiagSolvTool INFO Number / total chi2 of rejected eigenvalues: 0 0 ToolSvc.updateTool INFO Applying post-conditioning +Alignment delta chisquare/dof: 0.680899 / 144 +Alignment delta chisquare/track dof: 5.18298e-06 +Alternative ... Alignment: x86_64_v2-centos7-gcc11-dbg: Alignment: x86_64_v2-centos7-clang12-opt differs by: Alignment: Differences in Output Diff: Alignment: x86_64_v2-centos7-gcc11-opt: Average number of tracks per vertex: 7.38278 Normalised alignment change chisquare: 0.00472847 Number of active parameters: 168 Number of alignables with insufficient statistics: 0 Number of negative eigenvalues: 24 ToolSvc.EigenDiagSolvTool INFO Number / total chi2 of rejected eigenvalues: 0 0 ToolSvc.updateTool INFO Applying post-conditioning +Alignment delta chisquare/dof: 0.680899 / 144 +Alignment delta chisquare/track dof: 5.18298e-06 +Alternative ... Alignment: x86_64_v2-centos7-clang12-opt: Alignment: x86_64_v2-el9-gcc12-opt differs by: Alignment: Differences in Output Diff: Alignment: x86_64_v2-centos7-gcc11-opt: Average number of tracks per vertex: 7.38278 Normalised alignment change chisquare: 0.00472847 Number of active parameters: 168 Number of alignables with insufficient statistics: 0 Number of negative eigenvalues: 24 ToolSvc.EigenDiagSolvTool INFO Number / total chi2 of rejected eigenvalues: 0 0 ToolSvc.updateTool INFO Applying post-conditioning +Alignment delta chisquare/dof: 0.680899 / 144 +Alignment delta chisquare/track dof: 5.18298e-06 +Alternative ... Alignment: x86_64_v2-el9-gcc12-opt: Alignment: Warning, results for test: Humboldt.align-vp-halves-modules-splititer not found for platforms: {'x86_64_v3-centos7-gcc11-opt+g', 'x86_64_v3-centos7-gcc11+detdesc-opt+g'}
Click this to see encountered MooreOnline warnings
MooreOnline/x86_64_v2-centos7-gcc11-opt: Test MooreScripts.hlt2slim contains nonzero exit code and/or warnings! MooreOnline/x86_64_v2-centos7-gcc11-opt: Test without ref failed: MooreScripts.hlt2slim! MooreOnline/x86_64_v2-centos7-gcc11-dbg: Test MooreScripts.hlt2slim contains nonzero exit code and/or warnings! MooreOnline/x86_64_v2-centos7-gcc11-dbg: Test without ref failed: MooreScripts.hlt2slim! MooreOnline/x86_64_v2-centos7-clang12-opt: Test MooreScripts.hlt2slim contains nonzero exit code and/or warnings! MooreOnline/x86_64_v2-centos7-clang12-opt: Test without ref failed: MooreScripts.hlt2slim! MooreOnline/x86_64_v3-centos7-gcc11-opt+g: Test MooreScripts.hlt2slim contains nonzero exit code and/or warnings! MooreOnline/x86_64_v3-centos7-gcc11-opt+g: Test without ref failed: MooreScripts.hlt2slim! MooreOnline/x86_64_v2-centos7-gcc11+detdesc-opt: Test MooreScripts.hlt2slim contains nonzero exit code and/or warnings! MooreOnline/x86_64_v2-centos7-gcc11+detdesc-opt: Test without ref failed: MooreScripts.hlt2slim! MooreOnline/x86_64_v2-centos7-gcc11+detdesc-dbg: Test MooreScripts.hlt2slim contains nonzero exit code and/or warnings! MooreOnline/x86_64_v2-centos7-gcc11+detdesc-dbg: Test without ref failed: MooreScripts.hlt2slim! MooreOnline/x86_64_v2-centos7-clang12+detdesc-opt: Test MooreScripts.hlt2slim contains nonzero exit code and/or warnings! MooreOnline/x86_64_v2-centos7-clang12+detdesc-opt: Test without ref failed: MooreScripts.hlt2slim! MooreOnline/x86_64_v3-centos7-gcc11+detdesc-opt+g: Test MooreScripts.hlt2slim contains nonzero exit code and/or warnings! MooreOnline/x86_64_v3-centos7-gcc11+detdesc-opt+g: Test without ref failed: MooreScripts.hlt2slim! MooreOnline/x86_64_v2-el9-gcc12-opt: Test MooreScripts.hlt2slim contains nonzero exit code and/or warnings! MooreOnline/x86_64_v2-el9-gcc12-opt: Test without ref failed: MooreScripts.hlt2slim!
@freiss you can check on the linked MR how names changed
it looks like the hashes in the names haven't been fully removed. For example, there is a change
TrackVertexMonitor/PatPVLeftRightFinderMerger_c5a0159dVertexMonitor
->rackVertexMonitor/VertexMonitor__Event_PatPVLeftRightFinderMerger_c5a0159d_OutputVertices
.But that's fine, we'll have another look as we finalise the naming for the monitoring
in order to generate a unique name for
TrackVertexMonitor
(i.e. without hash) it uses the TES location that this monitor uses in its name, as that location is unique. What you see above is that that TES location in turn is automatically derived from the name of the producer, and the producer (i.e.PatPVLeftRightFinderMerger
) happens to still have a hash in its name. So this is a 'second order' effect that still has to be cured.
mentioned in merge request !391 (merged)
mentioned in commit d65d9766
mentioned in commit 555603cb
mentioned in issue Moore#598 (closed)