Fix bug in FT module addressing
id.mat() was used instead of id.module()
With this the HLT1 tracking efficiencies start to look much better:
long_validator validation:
TrackChecker output : 865/ 10981 7.88% ghosts
for P>3GeV,Pt>0.5GeV : 865/ 10981 7.88% ghosts
01_long : 9259/ 57970 15.97% ( 15.40%), 535 ( 5.46%) clones, pur 99.71%, hit eff 96.92%
02_long_P>5GeV : 9172/ 37115 24.71% ( 23.80%), 533 ( 5.49%) clones, pur 99.71%, hit eff 96.94%
03_long_strange : 181/ 2940 6.16% ( 6.21%), 4 ( 2.16%) clones, pur 99.76%, hit eff 96.55%
04_long_strange_P>5GeV : 180/ 1401 12.85% ( 13.55%), 4 ( 2.17%) clones, pur 99.76%, hit eff 96.53%
05_long_fromB : 10/ 53 18.87% ( 19.37%), 0 ( 0.00%) clones, pur 100.00%, hit eff 97.50%
06_long_fromB_P>5GeV : 10/ 29 34.48% ( 38.19%), 0 ( 0.00%) clones, pur 100.00%, hit eff 97.50%
07_long_electrons : 92/ 4393 2.09% ( 1.84%), 4 ( 4.17%) clones, pur 98.85%, hit eff 96.00%
08_long_electrons_P>5GeV : 92/ 2190 4.20% ( 4.44%), 4 ( 4.17%) clones, pur 98.85%, hit eff 96.00%
09_long_fromB_electrons : 1/ 11 9.09% ( 3.57%), 0 ( 0.00%) clones, pur 100.00%, hit eff 100.00%
10_long_fromB_electrons_P>5GeV : 1/ 6 16.67% ( 10.00%), 0 ( 0.00%) clones, pur 100.00%, hit eff 100.00%
long_P>5GeV_AND_Pt>1GeV : 6847/ 8057 84.98% ( 87.77%), 423 ( 5.82%) clones, pur 99.71%, hit eff 97.52%
long_fromB_P>5GeV_AND_Pt>1GeV : 9/ 11 81.82% ( 85.00%), 0 ( 0.00%) clones, pur 100.00%, hit eff 98.15%
11_noVelo_UT : 0/ 6777 0.00% ( 0.00%), 0 ( 0.00%) clones, pur -nan%, hit eff -nan%
12_noVelo_UT_P>5GeV : 0/ 2776 0.00% ( 0.00%), 0 ( 0.00%) clones, pur -nan%, hit eff -nan%
13_long_PT>2GeV : 1375/ 1538 89.40% ( 90.41%), 83 ( 5.69%) clones, pur 99.71%, hit eff 97.74%
14_long_from_B_PT>2GeV : 2/ 2 100.00% (100.00%), 0 ( 0.00%) clones, pur 100.00%, hit eff 100.00%
15_long_strange_P>5GeV : 180/ 1401 12.85% ( 13.55%), 4 ( 2.17%) clones, pur 99.76%, hit eff 96.53%
16_long_strange_P>5GeV_PT>500MeV : 180/ 530 33.96% ( 34.21%), 4 ( 2.17%) clones, pur 99.76%, hit eff 96.53%Edited by Roel Aaij