Add VP cluster efficiencies vs sensor number in VPClusterEffSimDQ
This merge request extends VPClusterEffSimDQ
with another profile histogram that describes the cluster efficiency in bins of (sensor number, x, y). It's more detailed than the integrated one and mostly suited for cross-checking the per-sensor hit efficiencies introduced in Boole!575 (merged)
Added 208 2D profile histograms for each sensor in the local frame mapped to channel numbers for easier plotting and direct comparison to the conditions above.
Merge request reports
Activity
assigned to @hcroft
mentioned in merge request Boole!575 (merged)
added RTA label
added VP label
If you do this in the local frame of the sensor you can map the efficiency bins to the 16x16 pixel efficiency patches set in the conditions. That would require more code to access the geometry through the sensors (see VPClusterMonitor for example, as you have to add access to Det) but would allow a direct comparison to the simulation efficiency map. I'd also expect the users of the profiles to prefer a 2D profile per sensor, but a ProjectionX("2dEffSensor103", 103,104) should extract sensor 103, making 208 separate profiles would allow the user to skip that step.
mentioned in issue Boole#24
removed RTA label
added Monitoring Simulation enhancement labels
- Resolved by Gloria Corti
@ldufour, is it correct that this is only monitoring for simulated samples?
Can it be used independently from Boole!575 (merged)?
And should we add it to the Boole monitoring? or merge it and add it to the Boole sequence after/concurrently to Boole!575 (merged)?
added RTA label
- Resolved by Gloria Corti
/ci-test
- Resolved by Gloria Corti
/ci-test --model lhcb-sim11
unassigned @hcroft
added ci-test-triggered label
- [2024-09-25 12:01] Validation started with lhcb-master-mr#11686
- [2024-09-25 12:03] Validation started with lhcb-sim11-mr#95
- [2024-09-25 15:03] Validation started with lhcb-master-mr#11688
- [2024-09-25 17:29] Validation started with lhcb-sim11-mr#97
Edited by Software for LHCb