Monitoring of HLT2 lines
We need to decide how to configure monitoring.
A first discussion was held today (2022-03-07) in https://indico.cern.ch/event/1118176/ (please see the slides). The feedback is that
- Functor based monitoring exists already, see !1046 (merged) (thanks @mramospe)!
- Flexibility to tailor monitoring to a given line is important, we should decide how to best express that without limiting ourselves.
- We should implement automatic default monitoring of the final state (we don't want 500 MRs). Good general quantities to monitor are mass, pT, decay time, vertex chi2, eta.
- This type of monitoring helps to catch line-specific issues early in the pit. It can also be useful when developing lines locally. It is not a substitute for producing ntuples offline and having more detailed studies (e.g. on correlations).
/cc @mstahl @sstahl @gligorov @msaur @poluekt @mvesteri @sklaver @raaij