B2ll lines and B2llgamma
B2mumu (also same-sign), B2hh, B2ee (also same-sign), B2emu (also same-sign) and the corresponding B2llgamma lines. The mass windows are large enough to cover B0 and Bs decays (in spite of the decay descriptor being Bs)
B2mumu and B2hh use Flavour Tagging
Lines inspired by Run 2 Stripping with the aim to allow lower lifetimes (favourable for B2hh and B2mumu TD-CPV studies).
Efficiency studied with a B2mumu sample (without HLT1 filter, denominator is CanRecoChildren):
Line: Bs_Hlt2RD_BToHH_LineDecisionTOS Efficiency: 0.621 +/- 0.019
Line: Bs_Hlt2RD_BToMuMu_LineDecisionTOS Efficiency: 0.525 +/- 0.020with a B2ee sample:
Line: Bs_Hlt2RD_BToEEGamma_LineDecisionTOS Efficiency: 0.000 +/- 0.000
Line: Bs_Hlt2RD_BToEE_LineDecisionTOS Efficiency: 0.268 +/- 0.019
Line: Bs_Hlt2RD_BToEE_SameSign_LineDecisionTOS Efficiency: 0.268 +/- 0.019
Line: Bs_Hlt2RD_BToEMuGamma_LineDecisionTOS Efficiency: 0.000 +/- 0.000
Line: Bs_Hlt2RD_BToEMu_LineDecisionTOS Efficiency: 0.002 +/- 0.002
Line: Bs_Hlt2RD_BToEMu_SameSign_LineDecisionTOS Efficiency: 0.002 +/- 0.002
Line: Bs_Hlt2RD_BToHH_LineDecisionTOS Efficiency: 0.110 +/- 0.013
Line: Bs_Hlt2RD_BToMuMuGamma_LineDecisionTOS Efficiency: 0.000 +/- 0.000
Line: Bs_Hlt2RD_BToMuMu_LineDecisionTOS Efficiency: 0.014 +/- 0.005
Line: Bs_Hlt2RD_BToMuMu_SameSign_LineDecisionTOS Efficiency: 0.000 +/- 0.000
Line: Hlt2RD_BToEEGamma_LineDecision Efficiency: 0.000 +/- 0.000
Line: Hlt2RD_BToEE_LineDecision Efficiency: 0.268 +/- 0.019
Line: Hlt2RD_BToEE_SameSign_LineDecision Efficiency: 0.268 +/- 0.019
Line: Hlt2RD_BToEMuGamma_LineDecision Efficiency: 0.000 +/- 0.000
Line: Hlt2RD_BToEMu_LineDecision Efficiency: 0.002 +/- 0.002
Line: Hlt2RD_BToEMu_SameSign_LineDecision Efficiency: 0.002 +/- 0.002
Line: Hlt2RD_BToHH_LineDecision Efficiency: 0.112 +/- 0.013
Line: Hlt2RD_BToMuMuGamma_LineDecision Efficiency: 0.000 +/- 0.000
Line: Hlt2RD_BToMuMu_LineDecision Efficiency: 0.014 +/- 0.005
Line: Hlt2RD_BToMuMu_SameSign_LineDecision Efficiency: 0.000 +/- 0.000Rates based on testfiledb_key: upgrade_minbias_hlt1_filtered
HLT rates:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Line: Hlt2RD_BToEEGamma_LineDecision Incl: 0.0 +/- 0.0 kHz, Excl: 0.0 +/- 0.0 kHz
Line: Hlt2RD_BToEE_LineDecision Incl: 0.0 +/- 0.0 kHz, Excl: 0.0 +/- 0.0 kHz
Line: Hlt2RD_BToEE_SameSign_LineDecision Incl: 0.0 +/- 0.0 kHz, Excl: 0.0 +/- 0.0 kHz
Line: Hlt2RD_BToEMuGamma_LineDecision Incl: 0.0 +/- 0.0 kHz, Excl: 0.0 +/- 0.0 kHz
Line: Hlt2RD_BToEMu_LineDecision Incl: 0.0 +/- 0.0 kHz, Excl: 0.0 +/- 0.0 kHz
Line: Hlt2RD_BToEMu_SameSign_LineDecision Incl: 0.0 +/- 0.0 kHz, Excl: 0.0 +/- 0.0 kHz
Line: Hlt2RD_BToHH_LineDecision Incl: 0.20022692384702662 +/- 0.11 kHz, Excl: 0.13348461589801777 +/- 0.09 kHz
Line: Hlt2RD_BToMuMuGamma_LineDecision Incl: 0.0 +/- 0.0 kHz, Excl: 0.0 +/- 0.0 kHz
Line: Hlt2RD_BToMuMu_LineDecision Incl: 0.06674230794900889 +/- 0.06 kHz, Excl: 0.0 +/- 0.0 kHz
Line: Hlt2RD_BToMuMu_SameSign_LineDecision Incl: 0.0 +/- 0.0 kHz, Excl: 0.0 +/- 0.0 kHz
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hlt2 Total: Rate: 0 +/- 0.1 kHz
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------For the radiative lines (that have zero rates) I have tested on the standard minbias sample with a significantly loosened BIPCHI2 (<1000)
...
make_B2EEGamma INFO Number of counters : 6
| Counter | # | sum | mean/eff^* | rms/err^* | min | max |
|*"# passed" | 12373 | 1 |(0.008082114 +- 0.008081788)% |
|*"# passed CombinationCut" | 1280 | 974 |( 76.09375 +- 1.192134)% |
|*"# passed CompositeCut" | 974 | 2 |(0.2053388 +- 0.1450473)% |
|*"# passed vertex fit" | 974 | 974 |( 100.0000 +- 0.000000)% |
| "Input1 size" | 12373 | 44 | 0.0035561 |
| "Input2 size" | 12373 | 221435 | 17.897 |
make_B2EMuGamma INFO Number of counters : 6
| Counter | # | sum | mean/eff^* | rms/err^* | min | max |
|*"# passed" | 12373 | 0 |( 0.000000 +- 0.000000)% |
|*"# passed CombinationCut" | 349 | 236 |( 67.62178 +- 2.504708)% |
|*"# passed CompositeCut" | 236 | 0 |( 0.000000 +- 0.000000)% |
|*"# passed vertex fit" | 236 | 236 |( 100.0000 +- 0.000000)% |
| "Input1 size" | 12373 | 14 | 0.0011315 |
| "Input2 size" | 12373 | 221435 | 17.897 |
make_B2MuMuGamma INFO Number of counters : 6
| Counter | # | sum | mean/eff^* | rms/err^* | min | max |
|*"# passed" | 12373 | 3 |(0.02424634 +- 0.01399694)% |
|*"# passed CombinationCut" | 1155 | 875 |( 75.75758 +- 1.260985)% |
|*"# passed CompositeCut" | 875 | 4 |(0.4571429 +- 0.2280484)% |
|*"# passed vertex fit" | 875 | 875 |( 100.0000 +- 0.000000)% |
| "Input1 size" | 12373 | 36 | 0.0029096 |
| "Input2 size" | 12373 | 221435 | 17.897 |
...So the selection does work. But I was not able to run over the (ancient) B2mumugamma sample.
Edited by Titus Mombaecher