Have a separate routing bit writer per stream

In the online world, all raw events go into one "pipe". They are later split into streams according to the routing bits. An event that is selected in N (>1) streams will thus get N raw events with slightly different content (e.g. different raw banks). A separate routing bit writer for each stream is thus needed in order to prevent having all of the N raw events go into each of the N streams.

• Add/modify a test so that we have some coverage for this

This is a follow-up from the February FEST

Goes with MooreAnalysis!73 (merged)

/cc @jonrob @nskidmor

added Configuration enhancement labels

assigned to @rmatev

added RTA label

added 152 commits

• 01b5f7b9...34cd4722 - 151 commits from branch master
• 95b00c5f - Have a separate routing bit writer per stream

Compare with previous version

added lhcb-head label

• [2022-02-27 00:14] Validation started with lhcb-head#3194
• [2022-02-28 13:12] Validation started with lhcb-master-mr#3812
• [2022-03-01 00:22] Validation started with lhcb-head#3196
• [2022-03-01 00:56] Validation started with lhcb-head#3196
• [2022-03-01 13:48] Validation started with lhcb-master-mr#3828
• [2022-03-01 18:15] Validation started with lhcb-master-mr#3834
• [2022-03-02 00:20] Validation started with lhcb-head#3197
• [2022-03-02 00:53] Validation started with lhcb-head#3197
• [2022-03-03 00:23] Validation started with lhcb-head#3198

removed lhcb-head label

added 1 commit

• a3dd283e - Have a separate routing bit writer per stream

Compare with previous version

marked this merge request as ready

marked the checklist item Add/modify a test so that we have some coverage for this as completed

/ci-test

added ci-test-triggered label

mentioned in commit MooreAnalysis@3df32323

mentioned in merge request MooreAnalysis!73 (merged)

added lhcb-head label

mentioned in commit MooreAnalysis@7582193f

resolved all threads

/ci-test --platforms=x86_64_v2-centos7-gcc11-opt

resolved all threads

changed the description

mentioned in commit lhcb-nightlies/Moore@cb8a2d88

• [2022-03-04 00:23] Validation started with lhcb-head#3199

mentioned in commit lhcb-nightlies/Moore@e07fae70

removed lhcb-head label

@jonrob @nskidmor I'd like to merge this soon (to make sure @sesen's work is adapted if needed and also so that online we run from master).

@rmatev I would prefer not to have a something new everyday to adapt.

I understand, but the change here is reasonably small and I can help adapt your MR (if needed at all, as it's really quite orthogonal).

Thanks @rmatev, I just had a comment and one suggestion

resolved all threads

added 1 commit

• d3ffbc13 - Apply 2 suggestion(s) to 2 file(s)

Compare with previous version

approved this merge request

merged

mentioned in commit e9905609

mentioned in commit MooreAnalysis@57b7682f

mentioned in issue #411 (closed)

mentioned in commit DaVinci@ff14b745

mentioned in commit DaVinci@ae892b9a