Hlt2 pp commissioning settings
Settings for running hlt2 on pp commissioning data with dd4hep. Goes with MooreOnline!174 (merged)
Superseded by !1961 (merged)
Merge request reports
Activity
added RTA label
- Resolved by Sebastien Ponce
Indentation needs to be fixed here. On top, I'm reluctant to add code without a test checking it's not broken. You may say the test is in MooreOnline but then I would move this file there too.
mentioned in issue DaVinci#81 (closed)
added 44 commits
-
e600041e...e499b772 - 43 commits from branch
master
- f8b5c3b0 - settings for running hlt2 on pp commissioning data with dd4hep
-
e600041e...e499b772 - 43 commits from branch
added 3 commits
-
f8b5c3b0...ae7cf082 - 2 commits from branch
master
- d754f475 - settings for running hlt2 on pp commissioning data with dd4hep
-
f8b5c3b0...ae7cf082 - 2 commits from branch
added 1 commit
- 8c92b64a - settings for running hlt2 on pp commissioning data with dd4hep
mentioned in merge request MooreOnline!174 (merged)
mentioned in merge request !1928 (merged)
- Resolved by Marian Stahl
Where are we with this ? Should it be retested ? Was a test added ? Should it go back to Draft ?
mentioned in merge request !1961 (merged)
- Resolved by Marian Stahl
added 109 commits
-
8c92b64a...2db843a7 - 108 commits from branch
master
- cc7b356f - settings for running hlt2 on pp commissioning data with dd4hep
-
8c92b64a...2db843a7 - 108 commits from branch
mentioned in issue #504 (closed)
/ci-test MooreOnline!174 (merged)
I was 15 minutes too late with the update :)
/ci-test MooreOnline!174 (merged)
Started integration test build. Once done, check the results or the comparison to a reference build.
Throughput Test Moore_hlt2_fastest_reco: 496.6 Events/s -- change of -0.16% vs. reference
Throughput Test Moore_hlt2_pp_thor: 242.5 Events/s -- change of -0.46% vs. reference
Throughput Test Moore_spruce_all_lines: 150.1 Events/s -- change of -0.59% vs. reference . Total bandwidth 2687.0 MB/s -- change of 0.00% vs. reference
Throughput Test Moore_hlt1_pp_default: 26629.2 Events/s -- change of 0.17% vs. reference
I don't see a connection of this MR to failures in that particular alignment test. @shollitt or @freiss can you please take a look? https://lhcb-nightlies.web.cern.ch/nightly/lhcb-master-mr/6598/Alignment/x86_64_v2-centos7-gcc11-opt/tests#Escher.align-ft-modules
For this MR, I've moved the streaming settings to MooreOnline, since they'll break the tests introduced in !1961 (merged) .
Indeed, and it was confirmed by @gunther that we've missed it in an MR merged yesterday. And it's there is master too : https://lhcb-nightlies.web.cern.ch/nightly/lhcb-master/1880/Alignment/x86_64_v2-centos7-gcc11-opt/tests
So this looks good then, let's try to merge.
It will be used in !1961 (merged) (which has already cherry-picked this MR so I could test it locally). I think this could be closed in favour of !1961 (merged).
Edited by Chris Burr
added ci-test-triggered label
- [2022-12-16 00:04] Validation started with lhcb-master-mr#6598
added 8 commits
-
cc7b356f...e17e2e83 - 6 commits from branch
master
- 67545c96 - settings for running hlt2 on pp commissioning data with dd4hep
- e1f780e6 - move stream settings to MooreOnline
-
cc7b356f...e17e2e83 - 6 commits from branch