Draft: B2OC: enforce Hlt2 PID selection for a set of 24 B2OC Spruce lines with large BW

added B2OC DPA-WP1 PR/Moore_spruce_bandwidth Spruce_June23 labels

requested review from @shunan

assigned to @abertoli

@shunan (cc @nskidmor) the list of B2OC Spruce lines for with we enforce the Hlt2 PID selection in attached (.xlsx format)

however this Spruce line: BuToDsD0Pi0Resolved_DsToKKPi_D0ToKPiOrKPiPiPi (11th in the total bandwidth ranking) already has the default PID cuts so likely the problem here is the Pi0Resolved

rates-for-all-lines.xlsx

added RTA label

added lhcb-head label

removed lhcb-head label

@isanders (@shunan @nskidmor) right now I see that the pipeline is on doc so as the build is fine let me already ask you to start a continous integration test here at your earliest convenience, many thanks !

Nicole, Shunan in that way we will quickly check if and by how much the total bandwidth went down (for the 24 investigated B2OC lines)

the only label needed is Moore_spruce_bandwidth right Shunan or Nicole ? am I forgetting something ?

/ci-test

added ci-test-triggered label

• [2023-08-11 13:16] Validation started with lhcb-master-mr#8905

so @nskidmor @shunan the comparison is:

• before
• after

in numbers from 0.449001 GB/sec to 0.375004 GB/sec, the total BW decreasing more that the rate

but I do not know how much BW we have to save ...

mentioned in merge request !2479 (merged)

Good morning. I see that this MR is still in draft and labelled with Spruce_June23, which makes little sense to me at this point in time. Can you advise and state where you are and what your plans are`? Advance thanks.

oups ... sorry ... just forgot to close this

B2OC knows that some work is needed on some Spruce lines, we have not yet decided when to launch a group wide tuning campaing ... I hope soon ...

closed

OK, cool. That is good news. From the side of DPA we will need to talk for the future campaigns :-).

resolved all threads