Tests for reco sequence with muon matching
Tests setting up the hlt1 reco sequence with muon matching
- only the .ref.x86_64-opt files are valid, the others have to be updated (- the mc-checking part contains a gentle hack because "MuonMatch" tracks are not valid for the PrChecker yet)
Merge request reports
Activity
added hlt1 reconstruction [DEPRECATED] ~1664 labels
changed milestone to %v50r1 (HLT1 showcase)
- Resolved by Alex Pearce
- Resolved by Alex Pearce
assigned to @apearce
assigned to @cprouve
added 1 commit
- 2f6e29b5 - replacing hack by using same principle as for standalone_hlt2_reco + applying...
unassigned @cprouve
- [2019-10-29 00:12] Validation started with lhcb-head#2413
- [2019-10-30 00:08] Validation started with lhcb-gaudi-head-py3#215
- [2019-10-30 00:08] Validation started with lhcb-test-throughput2#198
- [2019-10-30 00:09] Validation started with lhcb-sanitizers#416
- [2019-10-30 00:11] Validation started with lhcb-lcg-dev3#1067
- [2019-10-30 00:12] Validation started with lhcb-tdr-test#719
- [2019-10-30 00:13] Validation started with lhcb-head#2414
- [2019-10-30 00:13] Validation started with lhcb-gaudi-head#2434
- [2019-10-30 00:16] Validation started with lhcb-lcg-dev4#1078
- [2019-10-31 00:08] Validation started with lhcb-gaudi-head-py3#216
- [2019-10-31 00:09] Validation started with lhcb-sanitizers#417
- [2019-10-31 00:09] Validation started with lhcb-test-throughput2#199
- [2019-10-31 00:09] Validation started with lhcb-gaudi-head#2435
- [2019-10-31 00:10] Validation started with lhcb-tdr-test#720
- [2019-10-31 00:11] Validation started with lhcb-lcg-dev3#1068
- [2019-10-31 00:15] Validation started with lhcb-head#2415
- [2019-10-31 00:17] Validation started with lhcb-lcg-dev4#1079
Edited by Software for LHCbI think all the non-opt tests have now completed, so you should be able to grab the references now @cprouve.
The differences look pretty large to me though, e.g. in the
dbg
build (looking at the "CountersMismatch" field):(SciFiTrackForwarding ref) Search S1UV | 53 (SciFiTrackForwarding new) Search S1UV | 180 (SciFiTrackForwarding ref) Created long tracks | 935 | 47 | 0.050267 (SciFiTrackForwarding new) Created long tracks | 935 | 138 | 0.14759 (SciFiTrackForwarding ref) Search S2 UV | 76 (SciFiTrackForwarding new) Search S2 UV | 248 (SciFiTrackForwarding ref) Search S3UV | 411 (SciFiTrackForwarding new) Search S3UV | 1337 (SciFiTrackForwarding ref) Accepted input tracks | 71 (SciFiTrackForwarding new) Accepted input tracks | 240 (SciFiTrackForwarding ref) Search S1 | 93 (SciFiTrackForwarding new) Search S1 | 293 (SciFiTrackForwarding ref) Search S2 | 251 (SciFiTrackForwarding new) Search S2 | 835 (SciFiTrackForwarding ref) Search S3 | 2166 (SciFiTrackForwarding new) Search S3 | 7546
Are such big differences expected?
- Resolved by Alex Pearce
When I moved the
velo_track_min_ip parameter
into thestandalone_hlt1_muonmatching_reco
method I changed it's default value. I assume the difference is from there. Sorry.
- Resolved by Alex Pearce
Thanks! Let's run for one more night
added all-slots label and removed 1 deleted label
mentioned in merge request !285 (merged)