B2OC: Add Hlt2 LbToLambdaD lines

B2OC: Add 3 LbToLambdaD lines B2OC_LbToLambdaLLD0_D0ToHH B2OC_LbToLambdaLLD0_D0ToHHHH B2OC_LbToLambdaLLD0_D0ToHHHHWS

   LAZY_AND: Hlt2B2OC_LbToLambdaLLD0_D0ToHHDecisionWithOutput                                               #=10000   Sum=0           Eff=|( 0.000000 +- 0.00000 )%|
   LAZY_AND: Hlt2B2OC_LbToLambdaLLD0_D0ToHHHHDecisionWithOutput                                             #=10000   Sum=0           Eff=|( 0.000000 +- 0.00000 )%|
   LAZY_AND: Hlt2B2OC_LbToLambdaLLD0_D0ToHHHHWSDecisionWithOutput                                           #=10000   Sum=0           Eff=|( 0.000000 +- 0.00000 )%|

added B2OC label

requested review from @abertoli and @shunan

assigned to @hlei

hello @hlei cc @shunan, can you please run:

 curl https://gitlab.cern.ch/lhcb/Moore/-/jobs/35590235/artifacts/raw/apply-formatting.patch | git am

to fix formatting and right after push again to your branch, this command is given if you click on the red bullet of the pipeline

as long as the pipeline is red (except on doc) we can not proceed further with others LHCb automatic checks

0 out of 10000 is kind of less than 1/10000 so less than 0.01 % which would be rather large so you may have to tune the rate further

please fix formatting first !

added 1 commit

• 94da32af - Fixed formatting

Compare with previous version

changed the description

@hlei cc @shunan according to the description, that I just changed a bit for clarity, I understand that you are adding 4 new lines but I see:

so how many lines are you adding ? 3 or 4 ? can you update the description if needed ?

@hlei cc @shunan if we submit the code as it is now it is certain, 100 % probability, that we will get the question:

why are you leaving commented code in, for example, https://gitlab.cern.ch/lhcb/Moore/-/blob/b2oc_hlei_LbToLambdaD/Hlt/Hlt2Conf/python/Hlt2Conf/lines/b_to_open_charm/bbaryon_to_lightbaryon_d.py#L40-L51 ?

I see several other commented blocks of code

can you please remove them all and push a new version of bbaryon_to_lightbaryon_d.py ? I do not expect formatting issues when removing commented code but please check also formatting

ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh but if you are commenting out downstream downstream lines please do not do that ! leave them uncommented in the code ! the DD lines just have to be removed from the list of lines being run and then we can put them back at the right moment

so in this last case remove the comment and leave the definition of the line

@hlei cc @shunan in this new line you are booking:

def make_LbToLambdaLLD0_D0ToHH(process):
    if process == 'spruce':
        lm = basic_builder.make_lambda_LL()
        dz = d_builder.make_dzero_to_hh()
    elif process == 'hlt2':
        lm = basic_builder.make_lambda_LL()
        dz = d_builder.make_dzero_to_hh()
    line_alg = b_builder.make_lb(
        particles=[lm, dz],
        descriptors=['Lambda_b0 -> Lambda0 D0', 'Lambda_b~0 -> Lambda~0 D0'])
    return line_alg

I do not see any difference between the 'spruce' and the 'hlt2' case right ? so I would remove the if elif block

same for the other new lines you have added if needed

changed the description

added 1 commit

• 4e86185c - Add LambdabToLambdaD lines

Compare with previous version

added 1 commit

• 289bcef6 - Fixed formatting

Compare with previous version

changed the description

added PR/Moore_hlt2_bandwidth label

@shunan do you have anything else here ? if not, on Monday can you ask a CI round at least with the bandwidth platform ?

resolved all threads

changed target branch from b2oc_upgrade to master

@jagoodin as far as I know the PR bandwidth tests are back. We would like to study the rate and bandwidth of new lines added here so I temporarily changed the target branch to master. Could you launch a ci-test with platform x86_64_v3-el9-gcc13+detdesc-opt+g? Many thanks.

added RTA label

added ci-test-triggered label