Adding converted Lb->Lgamma and B+->K*+gamma lines
Evaluated using https://gitlab.cern.ch/lhcb/Moore/-/snippets/3292 assuming HLT output rate = 45100Hz
Bandwidth +0.184MB/s relative to rd-devel-spruce
| Line | Rate / Hz |
|---|---|
| SpruceRD_LbToLambdaGamma_DD_GammaToEEDD | 5 |
| SpruceRD_LbToLambdaGamma_DD_GammaToEELL | 9 |
| SpruceRD_LbToLambdaGamma_LL_GammaToEEDD | 2 |
| SpruceRD_LbToLambdaGamma_LL_GammaToEELL | 10 |
| SpruceRD_BuToKstpGamma_KstpToKSDDPi_GammaToEEDD | 0 |
| SpruceRD_BuToKstpGamma_KstpToKSDDPi_GammaToEELL | 2 |
| SpruceRD_BuToKstpGamma_KstpToKSLLPi_GammaToEEDD | 0 |
| SpruceRD_BuToKstpGamma_KstpToKSLLPi_GammaToEELL | 0 |
Merge request reports
Activity
- Resolved by Michele Atzeni
Honestly the LbToLambdaGamma is not really working (as feared). These lines are only picking up a few events for 100K input to HLT1 (about 1.5K passing the HLT2 filters). It's unsurprising because the HLT2 inputs aren't really suitable and I understand that the Lb builder was developed on a relatively small MC sample and still needs to be optimised.
BuToKstpGamma still being tested (it's an ancient MC sample causing some technical problems)
cc @rquaglia
Also cc @mschune and @cprouve who I'm told are also interested in this
Edited by Fionn Caitlin Ros Bishop - Last reply by Fionn Caitlin Ros Bishop
Resolved by Michele AtzeniThanks @fibishop for the hard work here.
If i get it right , the sprucing - resprucing would pick up something on Lb -> L gamma but it seems to be heavily suboptimal right?
- Do you think we need to plan for 2025 to include such line in Turbo?
- Do you agree that there seems to be NOT suitable inclusive selection in FULL able to select this efficiently enough?
- Do you agree that we would rather better improve HLT1 for such special signature instead?
Edited by Renato Quagliani
added RD label
added 1 commit
- 624e8094 - Put shared b2xgamma_conv spruce requirements into function
- Resolved by Michele Atzeni
- Resolved by Michele Atzeni
- Resolved by Michele Atzeni
- Resolved by Michele Atzeni