Skip to content

Tune QEE high-pT and high-mass muon lines for 2025

Ross John Hunter requested to merge rjhunter-qee-muon-line-tuning into qee_upgrade

FYI @lugrazet @isanders @paandreo @mvesteri

Changes aimed at reducing the rates to disk of the precision EW programme in QEE for 2025.

  • Add a loose isolation cut to SingleHighPtMuon sprucing line,
  • Do same to SingleHighPtMuonNoMuID, and tighten pT threshold. Add a SingleHighPtMuonNoMuIDNoIso line with tight pT threshold and tight prescale so we could still measure unbiased high-pT hadrons,
  • Increase pT threshold to something much more sensible for Z single and double muID lines,
  • Fix isolation cut in SingleHighPtMuonIso lines and tighten it up at HLT2 and sprucing,
  • Kill SingleMuon back-up sprucing lines after discussion on redundant lines that "may be used in the future" at last RTA WP3 meeting,
  • Small cleanup: use shared builder in single_high_pt_muon.py.

I have done some detailed studies (see bottom of description) that show that the first change should reduce the rate of our most costly line by around 40% for a loss of only ~2% relative efficiency per muon. I've also checked that we can perfectly supersede the cut offline. Nonetheless, I was still too scared to put the cut straight into HLT2, and in any case the disk budget is more important.

The other changes were sanity changes.

I've run a local bandwidth test in the same configuration as the nightlies, and overall this reduces the QEE full-stream sprucing bandwidth to disk by around 20%. The changes at HLT2 are pretty negligible.

TODO:

  • Local bandwidth test to check I didn't break anything, and give some numbers to the above.

261124_IsolationCutBenchmarking.pdf

Edited by Ross John Hunter

Merge request reports

Loading