Draft: Sprucing lines for partially reconstructed sexaquark searches
Re-implementation of (https://gitlab.cern.ch/lhcb/Stripping/-/blob/2018-patches/Phys/StrippingSelections/python/StrippingSelections/StrippingBandQ/StrippingSexaquark.py)[Sexaquark stripping] for 2025 sprucing
Looking for b-baryons to an antiproton, a meson and missing 4-momentum carrying two units of strangeness and 2 units of baryon number (labelled
The final states are
Each lines selects particles for isolation and candidates for tagging.
Status
So far only
Merge request reports
Activity
assigned to @pkoppenb
added qee label
added RTA label
Hi @pkoppenb, whenever you're ready for this to be merged could you target the
qee_upgrade
branch please? (we're trying to keep to one merge request per working group). The QEE RTA/DPA liaisons can then take a look at it. FYI @paandreo @isanders @lugrazetEdited by Ross John HunterThat's no problem at all. I will say that disk resources are scarce: I can't be more specific on a bandwidth budget at this stage, but we can't add lots as a working group (ideally we just reduce, but there's some flexibility). This can be discussed properly with the liaisons at the end, but I thought I'd give you the heads up now.
Hey @pkoppenb I just noticed that @eleckste opened Add Sexaquark sprucelines (!4379 - merged) and the title caught my eye. I wonder if you two have discussed with each other about similarities of your physics intent? I have no expertise in sexaquarks so perhaps they're completely different
, apologies if soYes we have. @eleckste has taken over. So this one can be closed.