Add option to run the full HLT2 reconstruction in HltEfficiencyChecker jobs
As titled. There is a new run_reconstruction
flag that can be specified in the yaml
, and the "by-hand" hlt2_eff_example.py
uses with reconstruction.bind(from_file=False)
. As such all the HLT2 HltEfficiencyChecker
examples run the reconstruction by default.
On a side note, the possibility of plotting with logx is added as requested by Mike Solokoff in RTAGeneral on Friday.
TODO:
-
Update the doc examples (add myself as CODEOWNER for the docs while I'm there) -
Make the rate examples use the reconstruction too -
Add a test that still runs reco from file.
Merge request reports
Activity
- Resolved by Ross John Hunter
@rjhunter Regarding Mike's request: do we need to add another option to the script or could we always generate the log and linear versions of the plots?
- Resolved by Ross John Hunter
- Resolved by Sascha Stahl
added 1 commit
- bdd65e50 - Apply suggestion to HltEfficiencyChecker/options/hlt2_eff_example.py
added 2 commits
mentioned in issue #13 (moved)
added 1 commit
- 5f572884 - Gamble and put the legend on the left if logx
@msaur this is ready for testing now, I can update the documentation in the meantime.
- Resolved by Christopher Rob Jones
/ci-test --merge
- [2020-07-08 17:52] Validation started with lhcb-master-mr#1056
- Resolved by Ross John Hunter
@rjhunter There are several failures related to x86_64-centos7-gcc9-dbg and x86_64-centos7-clang8-dbg platforms. Can you check that? Specifically: On x86_64-centos7-gcc9-dbg: RecoConf.hlt2_reco_full_geometry RecoConf.mc_cheated_pattern_recognition On x86_64-centos7-clang8-dbg: RecoConf.hlt2_reco_calo_resolution_pi0 --- here some files can't be accessed RecoConf.hlt2_reco_baseline_multi_threaded HltEfficiencyChecker.test_hlt2_example HltEfficiencyChecker.test_hlt2_wizard_effs HltEfficiencyChecker.test_hlt2_wizard_rates
- Resolved by Christopher Rob Jones
- avx2 issue is currently being investigated, it also created problems in many others MRs.
- regarding the timeout, for this would be beast to contact relevant maintainer and check if increased timeout will not be an issue due to some other reasons -> solved by comment form Sascha.
Edited by Miroslav Saur
assigned to @msaur
assigned to @msaur
- Resolved by Christopher Rob Jones
- [2020-07-09 16:27] Validation started with lhcb-master-mr#1060
mentioned in merge request Moore!571 (merged)
- [2020-07-13 09:30] Validation started with lhcb-master-mr#1076
assigned to @jonrob
mentioned in commit Moore@a23be6d8
mentioned in commit 433aa553
mentioned in merge request !16 (merged)
mentioned in issue Moore#198 (closed)
mentioned in issue Moore#202