a grammar for functordesc
@amathad fyi
this enables Gaudi::Property<collection<ThOr::FunctorDesc>>
.
before the only possible thing were "plain" Gaudi::Property<ThOr::FunctorDesc>
.
tested with std::vector<std::vector<ThOr::FunctorDesc>>
.
EDIT: modified with_functor_maps.h to work with the new grammar.
Merge request reports
Activity
mentioned in merge request Phys!930 (merged)
mentioned in merge request Analysis!792 (merged)
mentioned in merge request DaVinci!539 (merged)
assigned to @ascarabo
- Resolved by Christopher Rob Jones
please get the merge workflow started @ascarabo. it goes together with Phys!930 (merged)
added Accelerators label
removed Accelerators label
added lhcb-run3-cleanup label
- [2021-05-05 00:46] Validation started with lhcb-run3-cleanup#202
- [2021-05-06 00:44] Validation started with lhcb-run3-cleanup#203
- [2021-05-07 00:49] Validation started with lhcb-run3-cleanup#204
- [2021-05-08 01:06] Validation started with lhcb-run3-cleanup#205
- [2021-05-10 00:12] Validation started with lhcb-run3-cleanup#206
- [2021-05-11 00:41] Validation started with lhcb-run3-cleanup#207
- [2021-05-12 01:03] Validation started with lhcb-run3-cleanup#208
- [2021-05-13 00:59] Validation started with lhcb-run3-cleanup#209
- [2021-05-14 01:13] Validation started with lhcb-run3-cleanup#210
- [2021-05-16 00:28] Validation started with lhcb-run3-cleanup#211
- [2021-05-17 13:36] Validation started with lhcb-master-mr#2322
Edited by Software for LHCbThis worked. The PID_K functors now do something, which broke the DaVinciTests ref https://lhcb-nightlies.web.cern.ch/nightly/lhcb-run3-cleanup/203/DaVinci/x86_64-centos7-gcc9-opt/tests#DaVinciTests.functors.test_thor_functors
I'll fix the ref in DaVinci!538 (merged)
Now, I'd like this merged asap. However, I see Moore is broken in lhcb-run3-cleanup (but that's the TMVA removal).
Edited by Patrick Koppenburgmentioned in issue Moore#273 (closed)
mentioned in issue Moore#278 (closed)
- Resolved by Christopher Rob Jones
Hi @nnolte, this Rec test failed in lhcb-run3-cleanup#208. Can you please have a look? Is an update of the reference file necessary?
- Resolved by Christopher Rob Jones
It was easier to fix the test than to make it available. Check if that makes sense to you @nnolte .
added ci-test-triggered label