Hi @hvc, what you can do is to avoid using this TupleTool and rather use LOKI functors that extract the same information. See Phys!908 (merged)
i guess you did not intend to re-include this line back?
Hello, two comments from my side:
RareBaryonic
and MultiLepton
builders, you included all existing lines, although in the respective merge requests we discussed that some of them do not have to be re-run. This of course simplified things but I was not sure if this was intended.Vitalii Lisovskyi (11e71bd8) at 22 Jul 10:09
Sorry, my fault for copying things without renaming. Fixed in !1880 (merged)
Fixes !1775 (comment 6945772)
This waits for merging Phys!1069 (merged) In meantime, you can check it out yourself.
For the test, you need to exlude it from init.py of Calib WG
Sounds right. Thanks.
From the physics point of view, the StrippingBu2LLK_ee_K3piLine
line authors already have data from the previous restripping campaign: if the PIDe cut is in the end kept at the same threshold as before then there is no point in rerunning it again?