Adding new FTAG1 p6698 Samples

Description

• Adding new FTAG1 samples to the grid samples list. Samples where produced here
• Adding new GN3 & GNTau versions to the output
• Removing GN2v01 versions without aux tasks and with leptons
• Changing JetMatcher label from HadronConeExclTruthLabelID to HadronGhostTruthLabelID

Review checklist:

• CI Passing
• Comments addressed
• Source branch is up to date with target

requested review from @dguest and @svanstro

assigned to @alfroch

approved this merge request

enabled an automatic merge when all merge checks for d4c507de pass

unapproved this merge request

I'm wondering if, just in case someone wants to create some samples now, we should hold off on this MR until the samples have finished.

marked this merge request as draft

canceled the automatic merge

added 1 commit

• cdcc2175 - Adding GN3 & GNTau scores

Compare with previous version

changed the description

added 1 commit

• a246c8a0 - Adding new p6698 test file

Compare with previous version

added 1 commit

• 7bf06325 - Adding Sam's comments

Compare with previous version

resolved all threads

added 1 commit

• 869d6db9 - Changing JetMatcher label from HadronConeExclTruthLabelID to HadronGhostTruthLabelID

Compare with previous version

resolved all threads

changed the description

added 1 commit

• b1d85e11 - Removing old variables from the configs

Compare with previous version

added 1 commit

• 03bae6a9 - Fixing last pipeline issues

Compare with previous version

marked the checklist item CI Passing as completed

marked the checklist item Comments addressed as completed

marked the checklist item Source branch is up to date with target as completed

marked this merge request as ready

I'm going to defer to @svanstro for review here unless this is really urgent (he knows this better than I do).

It looks good to me. We are adding a lot of variables for the GN3 ablations which I don't really think we will need... but ok, better to have them now and then drop them later

Yeah depends on how people are doing the development here. I'd always hoped that people would use e.g. GN3 as a baseline configuration and make their own datasets as needed. This would favor having a small baseline configuration and then maybe a beefier one for some central studies.

But it seems like most (or maybe all) of the production is pretty centralized. Is your impression that pretty much everyone works with the centrally produced files?

From my personal feeling, yes

added 1 commit

• 75e16515 - Apply 1 suggestion(s) to 1 file(s)

Compare with previous version

approved this merge request

merged