Add decoration for the large-R jet tagger efficiencies
Some analyses need to define the a region between the tight and loose working point, which isn't calibrated, they need the tagging efficiencies to interpolate the scale-factors by hand. To do so, the expected tagging efficiencies are necessary. Moreover, three particular systematics for non-tagged jets modify the expected efficiency. To retrieve these varied efficiency for the tight working point along with the nominal efficiency for both tight and loose working points, decorations to large-R jets are added for custom savers to retrieve them. Note that efficiency variation for the loose working point is not needed since the loose-but-not-tight tagged region always pass the loose-tag.
Merge request reports
Activity
added 21.2 Analysis AnalysisTop urgent labels
added JetEtmiss analysis-review-required review-pending-level-1 labels
I added an "urgent tag" because I hope to sneak into the next release so that I can regenerate my large ttbar n-tuples with full systematics as soon as possible. They took days to finish on the grid and 3 days to make histograms on my local clusters. And my analysis still aims for summer conferences. https://its.cern.ch/jira/browse/ANALYSISTO-1102
Edited by Kuan-Yu Linassigned to @klin
CI Result SUCCESS (hash 23c542c8) AnalysisBase AthAnalysis externals cmake make required tests optional tests Full details available on this CI monitor view
AnalysisBase: number of compilation errors 0, warnings 0
AthAnalysis: number of compilation errors 0, warnings 6
For experts only: Jenkins output [CI-MERGE-REQUEST-CC7 34290] CI Result SUCCESS (hash 23c542c8) AthDerivation externals cmake make required tests optional tests Full details available on this CI monitor view
AthDerivation: number of compilation errors 0, warnings 17
For experts only: Jenkins output [CI-MERGE-REQUEST-GCC62-CC7 881] - Resolved by Kuan-Yu Lin
- Resolved by Kuan-Yu Lin
added review-user-action-required label and removed review-pending-level-1 label
removed urgent label
- Resolved by Kuan-Yu Lin
I will close this MR and will follow Oliver's proposal. I keep this request open a few days so that I can look up the discussion here easily.
mentioned in merge request !43937 (merged)