Model scenarios
Update from @jdevine with additional feedback for reporting, discussed with @andrejh (from https://gitlab.cern.ch/cara/cara/-/issues/39#note_3930969)
Possible mitigation measures:
If natural ventilation toggle was chosen by the user, graphs that shall be generated are:
- Specified scenario (event) in the html form -> no need to repeat this
- Windows OPEN, with masks
- Windows OPEN, without masks
- Windows CLOSED, with masks
- Windows CLOSED, without masks
- Windows CLOSED, with HEPA , with masks
- Windows CLOSED, with HEPA , without masks
IMP Note: if the use didn’t specify initially HEPA air flow, use 250 m3/h as default ! This should appear somewhere in the legend or below the plot
If mechanical ventilation toggle was chosen by the user, graphs that shall be generated are:
- Specified scenario (event) in the html form -> no need to repeat this
- Ventilation ON, with masks
- Ventilation ON, without masks
- Ventilation OFF, with masks
- Ventilation OFF, without masks
- Ventilation ON, with HEPA , with masks
- Ventilation ON, with HEPA , without masks
IMP Note: if the use didn’t specify initially HEPA air flow, use 250 m3/h as default ! This should appear somewhere in the legend or below the plot
If no ventilation toggle was chosen by the user, graphs that shall be generated are:
- Specified scenario (event) in the html form -> no need to repeat this
- HEPA , with masks
- HEPA , without masks
IMP Note: if the use didn’t specify initially HEPA air flow, use 250 m3/h as default ! This should appear somewhere in the legend or below the plot
For each scenario, we should list the P(infection) and the R rate – ideally tabulated. (NB The calculated scenario will already correspond to one of the above, it should be indicated in BOLD.)