Follow-up from "Add detection of strongly connected components in the data flow precedence rules"
The following discussion from !998 (merged) should be addressed:
-
@clemenci started a discussion: (+1 comment) This should become an issue, I think.
@leggett IIUC, this check was implemented by you? Could you please have a look? The StatusCode, it seems, is not propagated upstream leading to a segfault later on in execution.