Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
Corryvreckan
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Requirements
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Locked files
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Test cases
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Package Registry
Container Registry
Model registry
Operate
Environments
Terraform modules
Monitor
Incidents
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Code review analytics
Issue analytics
Insights
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
Fabian Simon Lex
Corryvreckan
Commits
6060ffd8
Commit
6060ffd8
authored
7 months ago
by
Bernhard Pilsl
Committed by
Finn King
5 months ago
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
fix FakeRate method RADIUS
tracks with an intercept got skipped, but we wanted to skip tracks without an intercept
parent
0ab20410
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
src/modules/AnalysisEfficiency/AnalysisEfficiency.cpp
+1
-1
1 addition, 1 deletion
src/modules/AnalysisEfficiency/AnalysisEfficiency.cpp
with
1 addition
and
1 deletion
src/modules/AnalysisEfficiency/AnalysisEfficiency.cpp
+
1
−
1
View file @
6060ffd8
...
...
@@ -571,7 +571,7 @@ StatusCode AnalysisEfficiency::run(const std::shared_ptr<Clipboard>& clipboard)
// discard tracks without intercept, using a tolerance defined
// by the radial cut which we will use later.
if
(
m_detector
->
hasIntercept
(
track
.
get
(),
-
m_fake_rate_distance
))
{
if
(
!
m_detector
->
hasIntercept
(
track
.
get
(),
-
m_fake_rate_distance
))
{
continue
;
}
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment