Follow-up from "Support alma9 containers"
The following discussion from !84 (merged) should be addressed:
-
@clemenci started a discussion: (+4 comments) I think we need a different approach, based on the target platform, so
-
x86_64_v3-centos7-gcc11-opt+g
->/cvmfs/cernvm-prod.cern.ch/cvm4
-
x86_64_v2-el9-gcc12-opt
->.../os-base/alma9-devel/prod/amd64
-
armv8.1_a-el9-gcc12-opt
->.../os-base/alma9-devel/prod/arm64v8
Then you can use inspection of the host CPU to decide which platforms you can run, e.g. if the CPU is
x86_64_v3
capable or is compatible witharmv8.1_a
. -