Updated to run only missing K3Pi MC datasets

This production is for an amplitude analysis of the B0→D0D0ˉK+π−B^0 \rightarrow D^0 \bar{D^0} K^+ \pi^-B0→D0D0ˉK+π− decay, with either (D0→K−π+)(D0ˉ→K+π−)(D^0 \rightarrow K^- \pi^+) (\bar{D^0} \rightarrow K^+ \pi^-)(D0→K−π+)(D0ˉ→K+π−), (D0→K−π+π+π−)(D0ˉ→K+π−)(D^0 \rightarrow K^- \pi^+ \pi^+ \pi^-) (\bar{D^0} \rightarrow K^+ \pi^-)(D0→K−π+π+π−)(D0ˉ→K+π−) or (D0→K−π+)(D0ˉ→K+π−π−π+)(D^0 \rightarrow K^- \pi^+) (\bar{D^0} \rightarrow K^+ \pi^- \pi^- \pi^+)(D0→K−π+)(D0ˉ→K+π−π−π+).

The analysis follows from the branching fraction measurement of this decay, and adds 2017 and 2018 data as well as D→K3πD \rightarrow K 3\piD→K3π sub-decays.

This will not supersede any previous productions.

Example tuples can be found in /eos/lhcb/user/j/jamey/AProd_examples/

This merge will just add the D to K3pi MC tuples to the analysis, which need to have specified production id's due to broken MC being present in the bookkeeping.

Instructions

When creating your merge request:

• Add a label for your WG
• Mark as "WIP:" until you're happy with the CI results
• If the merge request supersedes a previous one, add a comment at the end of the header: (supersedes !<MR number>). Please state explicitly in the description if the superseded ntuples can be deleted immediately, or after the new merge request is finalised

When ready:

• Remove the "WIP:" from the title:
• Assign the merge request to you working group's DPA/RTA liaison

To find your working group's DPA/RTA liaison, see this page:

https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/viewauth/LHCbPhysics/LHCbWGLiaisons