Skip to content

Change -> for => in Lb_gammapK=HighPtGamma

Carla Marin Benito requested to merge cmarinbe-LbpKGam-arrow into master

Running a test with 1k generated events, I get the following generator level efficiencies:

  • old (->): 0.52165+-0.011409
  • new (=>): 0.58754+-0.011932

so there's ~10% effect. I also see that in the second case there's one event passing the cut for which gamma_TRUEPT < 1500, which I guess is an unavoidable feature of accepting extra photons from this decay (although I'm surprised photos generated by PHOTOS can have such a large PT). I have also compared some kinematic distributions and see no differences (I can attach the plots if that could be useful).

I would like to know what's the convention for the alias of the decfile (I've added New for now but obviously that's not very informative). Should I keep the same as for the old decfile? For the event type, I've just added +1. Moreover, there are samples produced with the old decfile. Given there are no significant differences in the kinematic distributions I think they can be used for analysis but the generator level efficiency from those samples is indeed wrong. What is the recommended procedure here? Thanks!

Edited by Carla Marin Benito

Merge request reports