Removed unused cut . Renamed the file. This is a new…

Removed unused cut. Renamed the file. This is a new version of DstD0piKpiplus3piFromBIncl=DecProdCut_generator_cuts.dec These changes result from those to a GenCut file, as described in JIRA task LHCBGAUSS-1272

After the changes made to the GenCut file as discussed here: https://its.cern.ch/jira/browse/LHCBGAUSS-1272 we've realised the "old" DEC file that includes these generator cuts, DstD0piKpiplus3piFromBIncl=DecProdCut_generator_cuts.dec (Event type 27163000) will no longer be compatible with the GenCut file, because it contains a (redundant) cut "DaughtersPtMaxCut 150*MeV" which we got rid of in the GenCut file.

As the old DEC file has been used in the ongoing MC production, we're proposing this new DEC file with the above mentioned cut removed. We checked that a new Event Type "27163010" is available (2716300{1-9} are already used). Also, we're proposing a new name incl_b=Dst,piD0,Kpi,3pi=DecProdGenSpecialCuts.dec, which we think is clearer.

This looks fine, we will still have to obsolete DstD0piKpiplus3piFromBIncl=DecProdCut_generator_cuts.dec (Event type 27163000), but in principle I can do that. What is missing from this merge request is update of doc/release.notes. Could you please update it?

added 1 commit

• c01ac2e4 - Updated the release notes

Compare with previous version

Just to make sure: we're currently generating simulation with the old DEC file. Is obsoleting that file safe for the production?

Active productions have fixed version of Gauss, DecFiles etc., so they are not going to be affected by changes for in future versions.

Now all looks fine and ready for merge (mainly as note for myself).

• [2017-12-15 16:17] Automatic merge failed in lhcb-decfilestests#1434
• [2017-12-15 16:27] Automatic merge failed in lhcb-decfilestests#1434
• [2017-12-15 16:36] Automatic merge failed in lhcb-decfilestests#1434
• [2017-12-15 16:40] Automatic merge failed in lhcb-decfilestests#1434
• [2017-12-15 16:55] Automatic merge failed in lhcb-decfilestests#1434
• [2017-12-15 17:28] Automatic merge failed in lhcb-decfilestests#1435
• [2017-12-15 17:33] Automatic merge failed in lhcb-decfilestests#1435
• [2017-12-15 17:42] Validation started with lhcb-decfilestests#1435
• [2017-12-16 00:02] Validation started with lhcb-decfilestests#1436
• [2017-12-17 00:03] Validation started with lhcb-decfilestests#1437
• [2017-12-18 00:02] Validation started with lhcb-decfilestests#1438
• [2017-12-19 00:02] Validation started with lhcb-decfilestests#1439

added 1 commit

• 026dd0d8 - Fixed nickname typo

Compare with previous version

added 1 commit

• 0ed78db9 - Deleted old file. Reverted Event Type, because the new one was giving wrong…

Compare with previous version

We reverted the Event Type, because when the first two digits are 27, the penultimate digit changes the signal particle. We need this to be 0, and the final digits 1-9 are taken.

Also, because we are using the old Event Type, we had to delete the old DEC file, as it conflicted.

changed title from Removed unused cut . Assigned new Event Type. Renamed the file. This is a new… to Removed unused cut . Renamed the file. This is a new…

changed the description

The event type has to be changed, we cannot stay with previous one as there is sample already. I will sort this out tomorrow.

merged

mentioned in commit 94e18e40