Clear up ambiguity - `process` -> `input_process`

To go with Moore!1837 (merged), LHCb!3843 (merged), DaVinci!778 (merged)

added cleanup label

assigned to @nskidmor

mentioned in merge request Moore!1837 (merged)

mentioned in merge request LHCb!3843 (merged)

mentioned in merge request DaVinci!778 (merged)

added 1 commit

• 6a09efca - Fixed formatting

Compare with previous version

marked this merge request as ready

requested review from @pkoppenb and @erodrigu

approved this merge request

• [2022-11-10 17:04] Validation started with lhcb-master-mr#6192
• [2022-11-11 11:00] Validation started with lhcb-master-mr#6200
• [2022-11-14 18:39] Validation started with lhcb-master-mr#6248
• [2022-11-15 17:02] Validation started with lhcb-master-mr#6264
• [2022-11-16 12:14] Validation started with lhcb-master-mr#6286
• [2022-11-16 23:07] Validation started with lhcb-master-mr#6294
• [2022-11-17 09:22] Validation started with lhcb-master-mr#6299

added WIP dependency label

Hey, great to see this gigantic set of MRs to makes things clearer !

One question, now that we go with input_process=... rather than process=..., should this not default to "Spruce"since DaVinci is meant to run by default on outputs of the Sprucing rather than HLT2. Else I'm still confused by the meaning ofinput_process`. Sorry Nicole.

approved this merge request

added 5 commits

• 6a09efca...74aa6ba5 - 4 commits from branch master
• 507dd9e0 - fix

Compare with previous version

added 1 commit

• 56428271 - Fixed formatting

Compare with previous version

resolved all threads

merged

mentioned in commit 407b3dc0

mentioned in merge request !931 (merged)