@nskidmor (cc @shunan) I am assigning this to @msaur as he kindly offered to prepare a fix and discuss it at a WP3 meeting, hence adding @mvesteri and @poluekt
Miro is adding:
"On the other hand, I think that several groups are creating their own phi(1020), at least I am aware that RD and BnoC have their own version created from basic particles and Charm people are often creating their own definitions per module, so any impact could be rather limited."
but I have the feeling we should go in the opposite direction i.e. all PWG should use the same phi(1020) builder from standard_particles, at least B2OC will continue to use it from there
Hello @abertoli, @poluekt, @mvesteri, related MR is now open: !2612 (merged), please take a look on it. I will also prepare one summary slide for WP3 meeting today.