Lb0 to d0bar lcp km

Simple Sprucing line for the decay descriptor [ Lambda_b0 -> Lambda_c+ D~0 K-]cc

added Spruce_EoY24 label

added 1 commit

• d380070b - Small fix in decay descriptor

Compare with previous version

added 1 commit

• a4efdd96 - Fixed formatting

Compare with previous version

requested review from @yajing

requested review from @pengj

assigned to @khaberma

Hi @khaberma, sorry for the delay in responding. The code looks good to me. Did you do a local test and estimate the rate and bandwidth of this line? You can use this snippet to test: https://gitlab.cern.ch/-/snippets/2918

Hey @yajing. Im trying to run it right now, but I have some issues compiling the stack on lxplus. I hope to have it running by tomorrow

@yajing @pengj

@eleckste ran the tests now. We get 717kB out with the bandq_EoY_Sprucing branch and 726kB with the new branch.

I hope this is within limits. Can we go ahead with the merge? I think there is not too mich time left till the campain.

For the rate I get 59 × 9/1000 = 0.53 Gb/s

added 116 commits

• a4efdd96...b4433880 - 115 commits from branch bandq_EoY_sprucing
• 72278660 - Merge branch 'bandq_EoY_sprucing' into Lb0ToD0barLcpKm_bandq_eoy

Compare with previous version

Using the latest input in /eos/lhcb/wg/dpa/wp1/data/EoY-spruce-2024 (input rate 45.1kHz), the rate of the added line is 84.9Hz.

LAZY_AND: SpruceBandQ_Lb0ToD0barLcpKmDecisionWithOutput #=223233 Sum=420 Eff=|(0.1881442 +- 0.00917186)%|

Then bandwidth is 2MB*45.1kHz/223233 = 0.40MB/s.

I have no further suggestions. @mengzhen Do you think it is okay to merge?

approved this merge request

resolved all threads

merged

mentioned in commit a903a0e6

mentioned in merge request !3839 (merged)