Skip to content

Rd btoxll add acceptance and loosen selection for electron lines

Richard Morgan Williams requested to merge rd-btoxll-dev-inecal into rd-btoxll-dev

Requiring the following acceptance for electrons in the btoxll lines.

  • Long tracks : InECAL , InBREM , ELECTRONID > 0 (hasCalo)
  • Upstream tracks : InBREM
  • Downstream tracks (Not included for these lines ) : InECAL , ELECTRONID > 0 (hasCalo)

To Do:

  • Investigate loosening of B vtx chi2 and electron PIDe cuts
  • Include HLT1 selection requirement?
  • If HLT1 selection added (and potentially move to Turbo) could add DIRA(B) > 0.9999 to DIRA(B) > 0.9995, and PIDe > -2 to PIDe > -4

Rate Studies

Rates with just the acceptance cut: image

Rates with loosened PIDe and B vtx chi2

line Old-Rate New-Rate
BuToKpEE 285 +/- 19 Hz 165 +/- 15 Hz
BuToPipEE 172 +/- 15 Hz 45 +/- 8 Hz
B0ToKpPimEE 159 +/- 14 Hz 196 +/- 16 Hz
B0ToKpKmEE 10 +/- 4 Hz 9 +/- 4 Hz
B0ToPipPimEE 77 +/- 10 Hz 26 +/- 6 Hz
BuToKpKpKmEE 13 +/- 4 Hz 15 +/- 5 Hz
BuToKpPipPimEE 18 +/- 5 Hz 21 +/- 5 Hz
BuToKpResolvedPi0EE 102 +/- 12 Hz 67 +/- 9 Hz

Efficiencies

Computed from fits to 24c4 data

Results from fits to 24c4 data:

  • LL = '( ep_TRACKISLONG & em_TRACKISLONG )'
  • UL = '( ep_TRACKISUPSTREAM | em_TRACKISUPSTREAM )'

BuToKpEE

  • \epsilon( Acceptance | \text{ LL \& presel } ) = 86\%
  • \epsilon( Acceptance | \text{ UL \& presel } ) = 88\%
  • N( LL | \text{Pass Acceptance \& presel } ) = 277,262
  • N( UL | \text{Pass Acceptance \& presel } ) = 55,502

B0ToKpKmEE

  • \epsilon( Acceptance | \text{ LL \& presel }) = 83\%
  • \epsilon( Acceptance | \text{ UL \& presel }) = 89\%
  • N( LL | \text{Pass Acceptance \& presel } ) = 17,163
  • N( UL | \text{Pass Acceptance \& presel } ) = 3,560

Cut Breakdown using B0ToKpKmEE 24c4 data fits

  • \epsilon( InBrem | \text{ UL \& presel } ) = 88\%
  • \epsilon( InEcal | \text{ LL \& presel } ) = 88\%
  • \epsilon( InBrem | \text{ LL \& InEcal \& presel } ) = 97\%
  • \epsilon( hasCalo | \text{ LL \& InEcal \& InBrem \& presel } ) = 99\%

Cut Breakdown using BuToKpEE 24c4 data

Here I have simply computed the % of all events in HTL2 output (24c4 data) surviving the selection (sample is background dominated)

Selection Preselection Survival %
InEcal LL 13 %
InBrem LL & InEcal 60 %
hasCalo LL & InEcal & InBrem 96 %
InBrem UL 16%
Selection Preselection Survival %
InEcal LL & HLT1 46 %
InBrem LL & InEcal & HLT1 85 %
hasCalo LL & InEcal & InBrem & HLT1 98 %
InBrem UL & HLT1 47%

Where HLT1 is defined as:

'\
( Bp_Hlt1TrackMVADecision_TOS | Bp_Hlt1TwoTrackMVADecision_TOS ) \
| \
Bp_Hlt1TrackElectronMVADecision_TOS \
| \
Bp_Hlt1SingleHighPtElectronDecision_TOS \
| \
Bp_Hlt1DiElectronDisplacedDecision_TOS \
| \
Bp_Hlt1DiElectronHighMass_SSDecision_TOS \
| \
Bp_Hlt1DiElectronHighMassDecision_TOS \
| \
Bp_Hlt1DiElectronLowMass_massSlice1_displacedDecision_TOS \
| \
Bp_Hlt1DiElectronLowMass_massSlice2_displacedDecision_TOS \
| \
Bp_Hlt1DiElectronLowMass_massSlice3_displacedDecision_TOS \
| \
Bp_Hlt1DiElectronLowMass_massSlice4_displacedDecision_TOS \
'

For fits to data with the preselection:

'6.0 < q2_ConsB < 11.0 & Kp_PID_K > 4 & ( Bp_Hlt1TrackMVADecision_TOS | Bp_Hlt1TwoTrackMVADecision_TOS )'
'6.0 < q2_ConsB < 11.0 & ( 1_010 < phi_M < 1_030 ) & Kp_PID_K > 4 & Km_PID_K > 4 & ( Bs0_Hlt1TrackMVADecision_TOS | Bs0_Hlt1TwoTrackMVADecision_TOS )'

B0ToKpKmEE_LL_figures.pdf

B0ToKpKmEE_UL_figures.pdf

BuToKpEE_LL_figures.pdf

BuToKpEE_LU_figures.pdf

@mveghel @cmarinbe

Edited by Richard Morgan Williams

Merge request reports

Loading