Add configuration for the residual algorithms

Add configuration for the residual algorithms to remove redundancy between two long tracks and the downstream tracks.

Some more details can be found at https://indico.cern.ch/event/911373/ .

Part of https://gitlab.cern.ch/groups/lhcb/-/milestones/2 .

In details:

• PrForwardTracking takes the residual Velo tracks, SciFi hits and UT hits of match tracks as inputs

• PrLonglivedTracks takes the residual seed tracks, UT hits of match tracks as inputs

• Add an option fast_reco for make_hlt2_tracks and standalone_hlt2_full_track_reco;

• Add two option files for fast_reco: hlt2_fast_reco_tracking.py and hlt2_fast_reco_tracking_with_mcchecking.py accordingly.

To be merged after !517 (merged) cc @sstahl

Note:

• Currently the fromTrackv2PrSeedingTrack algorithm takes relatively long time, this would be solved once the issue in Rec be addressed;
• The residual tracks/hits of PrMatchNN are taken as inputs for PrForwardTracking and PrLonglivedTracks; if the residual of BestMatch are taken as inputs, the efficiencies would increase a little bit.

Efficiency & time comparisons between baseline_hlt2_reco and fast_reco: (run 100 Bs2PhiPhi evts):

++Efficiency `of BestLongTracks` in `baseline_hlt2_reco` 
BestLongTrackChecker                   INFO **** BestLong                            7567 tracks including           1069 ghosts [14.13 %], Event average 12.72 % ****
BestLongTrackChecker                   INFO   01_long                           :    5703 from     6643 [ 85.85 %]     11 clones [ 0.19 %], purity: 99.06 %, hitEff: 95.70 %
BestLongTrackChecker                   INFO   02_long_P>5GeV                    :    3839 from     4210 [ 91.19 %]      4 clones [ 0.10 %], purity: 99.11 %, hitEff: 97.15 %
BestLongTrackChecker                   INFO   03_long_strange                   :     263 from      322 [ 81.68 %]      0 clones [ 0.00 %], purity: 98.75 %, hitEff: 94.16 %
BestLongTrackChecker                   INFO   04_long_strange_P>5GeV            :     137 from      148 [ 92.57 %]      0 clones [ 0.00 %], purity: 98.80 %, hitEff: 97.15 %
BestLongTrackChecker                   INFO   05_long_fromB                     :     359 from      400 [ 89.75 %]      0 clones [ 0.00 %], purity: 99.24 %, hitEff: 96.56 %
BestLongTrackChecker                   INFO   06_long_fromB_P>5GeV              :     296 from      311 [ 95.18 %]      0 clones [ 0.00 %], purity: 99.18 %, hitEff: 97.12 %
BestLongTrackChecker                   INFO   07_long_electrons                 :     318 from      515 [ 61.75 %]      1 clones [ 0.31 %], purity: 98.10 %, hitEff: 92.73 %
BestLongTrackChecker                   INFO   08_long_fromB_electrons           :       7 from       11 [ 63.64 %]      0 clones [ 0.00 %], purity: 98.30 %, hitEff: 95.37 %
BestLongTrackChecker                   INFO   09_long_fromB_electrons_P>5GeV    :       5 from        6 [ 83.33 %]      0 clones [ 0.00 %], purity: 97.62 %, hitEff: 94.38 %
BestLongTrackChecker                   INFO   10_long_fromB_P>3GeV_Pt>0.5GeV    :     292 from      313 [ 93.29 %]      0 clones [ 0.00 %], purity: 99.13 %, hitEff: 97.00 %
BestLongTrackChecker                   INFO   11_UT_long_fromB_P>3GeV_Pt>0.5GeV :     292 from      312 [ 93.59 %]      0 clones [ 0.00 %], purity: 99.13 %, hitEff: 97.00 %

++Efficiency of BestLongTracks in fast_reco

BestLongTrackChecker                   INFO **** BestLong                            7217 tracks including            851 ghosts [11.79 %], Event average 10.72 % ****
BestLongTrackChecker                   INFO   01_long                           :    5626 from     6643 [ 84.69 %]      9 clones [ 0.16 %], purity: 99.09 %, hitEff: 95.61 %
BestLongTrackChecker                   INFO   02_long_P>5GeV                    :    3805 from     4210 [ 90.38 %]      4 clones [ 0.11 %], purity: 99.14 %, hitEff: 97.07 %
BestLongTrackChecker                   INFO   03_long_strange                   :     254 from      322 [ 78.88 %]      0 clones [ 0.00 %], purity: 98.87 %, hitEff: 94.19 %
BestLongTrackChecker                   INFO   04_long_strange_P>5GeV            :     133 from      148 [ 89.86 %]      0 clones [ 0.00 %], purity: 98.80 %, hitEff: 97.15 %
BestLongTrackChecker                   INFO   05_long_fromB                     :     355 from      400 [ 88.75 %]      0 clones [ 0.00 %], purity: 99.25 %, hitEff: 96.59 %
BestLongTrackChecker                   INFO   06_long_fromB_P>5GeV              :     293 from      311 [ 94.21 %]      0 clones [ 0.00 %], purity: 99.18 %, hitEff: 97.10 %
BestLongTrackChecker                   INFO   07_long_electrons                 :     291 from      515 [ 56.50 %]      0 clones [ 0.00 %], purity: 98.13 %, hitEff: 92.71 %
BestLongTrackChecker                   INFO   08_long_fromB_electrons           :       7 from       11 [ 63.64 %]      0 clones [ 0.00 %], purity: 98.30 %, hitEff: 95.37 %
BestLongTrackChecker                   INFO   09_long_fromB_electrons_P>5GeV    :       5 from        6 [ 83.33 %]      0 clones [ 0.00 %], purity: 97.62 %, hitEff: 94.38 %
BestLongTrackChecker                   INFO   10_long_fromB_P>3GeV_Pt>0.5GeV    :     288 from      313 [ 92.01 %]      0 clones [ 0.00 %], purity: 99.12 %, hitEff: 97.00 %
BestLongTrackChecker                   INFO   11_UT_long_fromB_P>3GeV_Pt>0.5GeV :     288 from      312 [ 92.31 %]      0 clones [ 0.00 %], purity: 99.12 %, hitEff: 97.00 %

++Time of all the reconstruction algorithms: (roughly estimated according to the record time in the test)

time of PrSeedingTracks + PrMatchNN + PrForwardTracking + PrLonglivedTracks+ PrResidualVeloTracks + PrResidualSciFi PrResidualPrUTHits + PrResiudalSeedTracks + PrResidualUTHits: 
baseline_hlt2_reco: 2.922 + 0.750 + 7.230 + 6.027 = 16.929
fast_reco: 2.922 + 0.750 + 2.372 + 1.676 + 0.014 + 0.113 + 0.017 + 0.011 + 0.373 = 8.248

Test for 100 KstEE events: ++Efficiency of BestLongTrack in baseline_hlt2_reco:

BestLongTrackChecker                   INFO **** BestLong                            6808 tracks including            897 ghosts [13.18 %], Event average 12.47 % ****
BestLongTrackChecker                   INFO   01_long                           :    5086 from     5858 [ 86.82 %]     20 clones [ 0.39 %], purity: 99.11 %, hitEff: 95.84 %
BestLongTrackChecker                   INFO   02_long_P>5GeV                    :    3348 from     3638 [ 92.03 %]      3 clones [ 0.09 %], purity: 99.23 %, hitEff: 97.38 %
BestLongTrackChecker                   INFO   03_long_strange                   :     212 from      266 [ 79.70 %]      1 clones [ 0.47 %], purity: 99.21 %, hitEff: 94.78 %
BestLongTrackChecker                   INFO   04_long_strange_P>5GeV            :     104 from      125 [ 83.20 %]      0 clones [ 0.00 %], purity: 99.41 %, hitEff: 97.41 %
BestLongTrackChecker                   INFO   05_long_fromB                     :     235 from      256 [ 91.80 %]      1 clones [ 0.42 %], purity: 99.48 %, hitEff: 96.96 %
BestLongTrackChecker                   INFO   06_long_fromB_P>5GeV              :     183 from      191 [ 95.81 %]      1 clones [ 0.54 %], purity: 99.46 %, hitEff: 97.60 %
BestLongTrackChecker                   INFO   07_long_electrons                 :     352 from      536 [ 65.67 %]      0 clones [ 0.00 %], purity: 98.41 %, hitEff: 93.90 %
BestLongTrackChecker                   INFO   08_long_fromB_electrons           :     121 from      144 [ 84.03 %]      0 clones [ 0.00 %], purity: 98.91 %, hitEff: 96.29 %
BestLongTrackChecker                   INFO   09_long_fromB_electrons_P>5GeV    :     114 from      133 [ 85.71 %]      0 clones [ 0.00 %], purity: 99.00 %, hitEff: 96.58 %
BestLongTrackChecker                   INFO   10_long_fromB_P>3GeV_Pt>0.5GeV    :     175 from      183 [ 95.63 %]      1 clones [ 0.57 %], purity: 99.52 %, hitEff: 97.47 %
BestLongTrackChecker                   INFO   11_UT_long_fromB_P>3GeV_Pt>0.5GeV :     175 from      183 [ 95.63 %]      1 clones [ 0.57 %], purity: 99.52 %, hitEff: 97.47 %

++Efficiency of BestLongTrack in fast_reco:

BestLongTrackChecker                   INFO **** BestLong                            6531 tracks including            727 ghosts [11.13 %], Event average 10.63 % ****
BestLongTrackChecker                   INFO   01_long                           :    5025 from     5858 [ 85.78 %]     14 clones [ 0.28 %], purity: 99.16 %, hitEff: 95.75 %
BestLongTrackChecker                   INFO   02_long_P>5GeV                    :    3317 from     3638 [ 91.18 %]      3 clones [ 0.09 %], purity: 99.25 %, hitEff: 97.29 %
BestLongTrackChecker                   INFO   03_long_strange                   :     208 from      266 [ 78.20 %]      1 clones [ 0.48 %], purity: 99.14 %, hitEff: 94.60 %
BestLongTrackChecker                   INFO   04_long_strange_P>5GeV            :     104 from      125 [ 83.20 %]      0 clones [ 0.00 %], purity: 99.38 %, hitEff: 97.30 %
BestLongTrackChecker                   INFO   05_long_fromB                     :     232 from      256 [ 90.62 %]      1 clones [ 0.43 %], purity: 99.46 %, hitEff: 96.74 %
BestLongTrackChecker                   INFO   06_long_fromB_P>5GeV              :     181 from      191 [ 94.76 %]      1 clones [ 0.55 %], purity: 99.43 %, hitEff: 97.41 %
BestLongTrackChecker                   INFO   07_long_electrons                 :     334 from      536 [ 62.31 %]      0 clones [ 0.00 %], purity: 98.41 %, hitEff: 93.81 %
BestLongTrackChecker                   INFO   08_long_fromB_electrons           :     119 from      144 [ 82.64 %]      0 clones [ 0.00 %], purity: 98.96 %, hitEff: 96.37 %
BestLongTrackChecker                   INFO   09_long_fromB_electrons_P>5GeV    :     112 from      133 [ 84.21 %]      0 clones [ 0.00 %], purity: 99.06 %, hitEff: 96.68 %
BestLongTrackChecker                   INFO   10_long_fromB_P>3GeV_Pt>0.5GeV    :     174 from      183 [ 95.08 %]      1 clones [ 0.57 %], purity: 99.49 %, hitEff: 97.28 %
BestLongTrackChecker                   INFO   11_UT_long_fromB_P>3GeV_Pt>0.5GeV :     174 from      183 [ 95.08 %]      1 clones [ 0.57 %], purity: 99.49 %, hitEff: 97.28 %

++Time of all the reconstruction algorithms: (roughly estimated according to the record time in the test)

time of PrSeedingTracks + PrMatchNN + PrForwardTracking + PrLonglivedTracks+ PrResidualVeloTracks + PrResidualSciFi PrResidualPrUTHits + PrResiudalSeedTracks + PrResidualUTHits: 
baseline_hlt2_reco: 2.274 + 0.683 + 5.820 + 5.433 = 14.21
fast_reco: 2.274 + 0.683 + 2.365 + 1.530 + 0.013 + 0.097 + 0.016 + 0.010 + 0.339 = 7.327

Reference files updated in !579 (merged)