Improve extraction of runArgs.inputGeneratorFile from jO
Changes introduced
- Instead of checking for the presence of
runArgs.inputGeneratorFile
we execute the jO to see ifrunArgs.inputGeneratorFile
gets assigned a valid value or if it isNone
Tests
!637 (merged)
jO submitted inPASSES
runArgs.inputGeneratorFile = "a"
Using ERROR
#runArgs.inputGeneratorFile = "a"
(commented string)
Using PASSES
runArgs.inputGeneratorFile = a
(where a
is an undefined value in the jO)
Using PASSES
runArgs.inputGeneratorFile = a,b
(where a,b
are two strings previously defined in the jO)
Using For instance in the jO I put:
a="a"
b="b"
runArgs.inputGeneratorFile = a,b
ERROR
Issues resolved
Closes #120 (closed)
Merge request reports
Activity
Filter activity
changed milestone to %S2.2020
added new feature label
added 13 commits
-
d0d320cd...ded66f24 - 4 commits from branch
master
- 965e3f1d - tW Diagram Subtraction (1,2) aMC@NLO+MadSpin+Pythia
- 6c3cd4e9 - removing redundant files [skip athena]
- a809bc39 - tW Diagram Subtraction (1,2) aMC@NLO+MadSpin+Pythia
- 6746687a - removing redundant files [skip athena]
- 79a405cb - =workaround to fix bug when reading lhe file [skip athena]
- 2c563d39 - =SUSY-inspired handling of tarfiles [skip athena] [skip modfiles]
- 0b974a57 - Fix runArgs check
- 9ca34fe2 - Make jo_utils more generic
- fd69fe62 - Restore changed files
Toggle commit list-
d0d320cd...ded66f24 - 4 commits from branch
Please register or sign in to reply